Search Results for "developer capacity"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "developer capacity"

299 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 299 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Reserves Judgment in PIL Challenging Redevelopment Permissions in Heritage Precinct. Residents Allege Violation of Development Control Regulations and Arbitrary Administrative Actions by Municipal Authorities and Developer.

19 Oct 2018

The matter before the Bombay High Court was a Public Interest Litigation filed by four residents of Carmichael Road, Mumbai, including Normandie Coope...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case on Section 80IA Deduction for Infrastructure Development. The Court held that the Assessee, engaged in construction of commercial assets, was not eligible for deduction under Section 80IA(4)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as the activity did not constitute 'infrastructure facility'.

5 Jul 2023

The present appeals were filed by the Revenue (Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Pune) against a common order dated 25th November 2016 passed by the Inc...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Petitioners Challenging Modifications to Development Control Regulations for Greater Bombay, 1991 Under Section 37 of MRTP Act. Petitioners Allege Amendments Are Not Minor, Ultra Vires, and Violate Right to Clean Environment Under Article 21.

21 Nov 2006

Seven petitioners, all tax payers and rate-payers of the State of Maharashtra and the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay, filed a writ petition u...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging MHADA's Refusal to Register Proposed Cooperative Housing Society Under Section 22 of MHADA Act, 1976 — Held That a Proposed Society Is Entitled to Seek Registration and the Authority Cannot Refuse on Grounds of Non-Completion of Construction.

26 Mar 2015

The petitioners, Bhartiya Vidya Bhavan (Bavla Compound) Co-op. Housing Society (proposed) and its promoters, along with Darshan Developers, filed a wr...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Regularisation of Irregular Allotment of Land for Commercial Complex in Navi Mumbai, Imposing Restitution of Rs. 100 Crore. The Court held that where irreversible economic and social consequences have crystallised over two decades, public interest may be better served by regularisation with full financial restitution rather than demolition.

1 Jan 2026

The case pertains to a challenge against the allotment of land by CIDCO to K. Raheja Corp. Private Limited (the Developer) for the construction of a s...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Tender Disqualification for Non-Compliance with Green Building Certificate Condition. Interim IGBC Certificate Does Not Satisfy Requirement of Completed Green Building Project.

5 Aug 2024

The petitioner, Pride Ventures (I) Pvt. Ltd., challenged its disqualification from a tender issued by the Public Works Department for construction of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to AGRC Order in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute. AGRC's order directing SRA to decide on eligibility of slum dwellers for rehabilitation based on cut-off date upheld as valid exercise of appellate jurisdiction under Section 33 of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971.

2 Apr 2024

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by M/s. Sateri Builders and Developers LLP (the Developer) and Shree Gurukrupa (SRA) Co-operative Ho...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Interim Injunction Application in Redevelopment Dispute and Holds Civil Suit Not Barred by Section 91 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Developer's Claim for Specific Performance of Development Agreement Against Co-operative Housing Society Held Maintainable as Developer Is Not a Member Under Section 91, and Transaction Not Subject to Restrictions Under Sections 43, 44, or 45.

13 Jul 2016

The suit was filed by a partnership firm of developers, Maya Developers, against the Azad Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. and its members, seeking s...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to SRA Order in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme. CEO's Direction to Process Letter of Intent Upheld as 70% Consent of Eligible Members Was Validly Obtained Under DCR 33(10).

28 Jan 2011

The case involves a slum rehabilitation scheme under DCR 33(10) of the Development Control Regulations for Greater Mumbai. The petitioners, Lokhandwal...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenants' Challenge to MHADA Acquisition of Cessed Buildings for Redevelopment. Tenants Lack Locus Standi to Challenge Acquisition and Tender Process Under Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976.

10 Oct 2023

The petitioners, tenants of Dattatraya Buildings in Mumbai, filed writ petitions challenging the acquisition of the buildings by the Maharashtra Housi...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)