Search Results for "delayed gratuity"

122 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 122 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Petition Challenging MAT Order Granting Interest on Delayed Pension. Exonerated Employee Entitled to Interest on Delayed Retirement Benefits as Natural Consequence.

The State of Maharashtra filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal (MAT), Nagpur, dated 21.7.1999. The MAT...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition for Gratuity Due to Alternative Remedy Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Writ of Mandamus Not Maintainable as Statutory Remedy Under Section 7 of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Was Available to Petitioner.

The petitioner, Babu Shankarappa Mukkannvar, a former First Division Clerk at the Postpartum Centre, J.N. Medical College, Belgaum, filed a writ petit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Interest on Delayed Retiral Benefits to Exonerated Employee — Rule 55A(7) of Pension Rules, 1953 Deems Payment Due from Retirement Date, Not Exoneration Date, and Interest Is Payable Without Proving Administrative Lapse.

The petitioner, Narayan Pundalik Pathade, a retired employee of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM), filed a writ petition under Articl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Refers Questions on Applicability of Payment of Gratuity Act to Temples to Full Bench. Division Bench Finds Arguable Questions Whether Temple is 'Commercial Establishment' Under Karnataka Shops Act and Whether Prior Precedent on Temple Employee's Gratuity is Correct.

The dispute arose when a former employee of Shri Mookambika Temple, Kollur, claimed gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 after his superan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Leave Encashment Claim Despite Delay, Rejects Limitation Bar for Continuing Wrong. Petitioner, a retired government servant, entitled to leave encashment for 300 days under Gujarat Civil Services (Leave) Rules, 2002, and delay in filing writ petition condoned as continuing wrong.

The petitioner, Vijay B. Shah, was appointed by respondent No. 3 on a regular pay scale and rendered services for about 17 years before retiring on 30...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Pensionary Benefits to Daily Wager by Counting Entire Service from Initial Appointment. Daily Wage Service Counts as Qualifying Service for Pension Under Rule 3(8) of Gujarat Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 2002 When Followed by Regularization.

The petitioner, Bhathibhai Valambhai Baria, was initially appointed as a daily wager on 01.06.2002 by the respondents (State of Gujarat and its author...