KAHC010822332025_1
8 Jul 2026The Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka heard two intra-court writ appeals filed by M/s MP24 Construction Company, the lead member of a cons...
Search Results for "defaulter disqualification"
65 result(s) found
Found 65 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Liability for Pre-Sale Property Tax Arrears After Sale of Property. Transferor Not Liable for Taxes Accruing After Transfer Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.
21 Sep 2023The petitioner, Vishal Laxman Sakhare, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Additional Divisional Commissioner, Pune, which reversed the ...
- 38
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Rejection of Objections to Nomination in Co-operative Society Election — Petitioner's Objections to Respondent's Nomination Were Not Properly Considered by Election Officer
17 Jan 2023The petitioner, Vaibhav Manohar Bhokare, filed two writ petitions challenging an order dated 03.01.2023 passed by the District Co-operative Election O...
- 83
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Concession Agreement for Non-Payment of Revenue Share. Court upholds termination as valid under Article 21.2 of the Concession Agreement for failure to pay monthly revenue share, rejecting claims of force majeure and breach of contract by the respondent.
20 Aug 2022The petitioners, MEP Infrastructure Developers Ltd., Ozoneland Private Limited, Mrs. Anuya J. Mhaiskar, and Mr. Manoj Upadhyay, filed a writ petition ...
- 29
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Interprets Section 29A(h) of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Regarding Guarantor Eligibility. The court held that a person who has executed an enforceable guarantee is not disqualified from submitting a resolution plan unless the guarantee has been invoked, as liability crystallizes upon invocation under the amended provisions.
18 Jan 2022The Supreme Court was called upon to interpret Section 29A(h) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, as amended, concerning the eligibility of a...
- 311
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Rejection of Technical Bid in Tender Process — Shareholding in Defaulter Company Not a Valid Ground for Disqualification Without Prior Notice or Opportunity. The court held that rejection of a bid based on past shareholding in a defaulter company, without giving an opportunity to explain, is arbitrary and unsustainable.
19 Jul 2017The petitioner, Ganesh Vishal Infra Engineering Pvt. Ltd., challenged the decision of the respondent no.1, Mormugao Port Trust, rejecting its technica...
- 27
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Acceptance of Nomination in Cooperative Society Election Due to Disqualification Under Byelaws. Failure to Pay Interest and Non-Compliance with Construction Obligations Under Byelaw 50(6) of the Society Justified Deletion of Candidate's Name from Valid Nominees List.
20 Jul 2016The petitioner, Damodar Shamrao Pande, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Nagpur challenging the acceptance of the nomination paper...
- 149
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Nomination for Gram Panchayat Election. Nomination Rejection Under Section 14(1)(h) of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 Set Aside for Non-Application of Mind.
22 Mar 2012The petitioner, Dr. Satish Sadashiv Kulkarni, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order date...
- 31
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Nomination for Cooperative Bank Election. Disqualification under Section 73EA of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 applies to societies, not individual delegates.
21 Jun 2011The petitioner, Babasaheb Devidasrao Borade, was a director and member of the managing committee of respondent No. 4, Vividh Karyakari Seva Sahkari So...
- 114
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Acceptance of Nomination for APMC Election Due to Disqualification Under Section 16 of M.S. Act, 1960. Respondent No. 4 was disqualified as a defaulter of a cooperative society, yet nomination was improperly accepted.
18 Jun 2010The petitioners, Dinkar Uttamrao Patil and Pundlik Raoji Pawar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay...
- 95
