Search Results for "contractual discretion"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "contractual discretion"

515 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 515 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Appeal in Arbitration Case Upholding Arbitral Award. Challenge to Tribunal's Constitution Fails as 30-Day Appointment Period in Arbitration Agreement is Directory, Not Mandatory, Under Sections 16, 34, and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

11 Mar 2026

The dispute originated from a consultancy agreement dated 18 September 1995 between the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) and Respondent ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Tender Cancellation Case — Public Interest Justifies Cancellation of LoI Despite Prior Acceptance. Non-Arbitrariness in State Action Not Established When Cancellation is Based on Legitimate Concerns Over Technical Compliance and Financial Viability.

24 Nov 2025

The dispute arose from a tender issued by the State of Himachal Pradesh for the supply, installation, and maintenance of electronic Point-of-Sale (ePO...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows IRCTC's Appeals in Catering Contract Dispute, Restricts Interference Under Sections 34 and 37 of Arbitration Act. Court holds that High Court erred in re-appreciating evidence and substituting its own view over arbitrator's findings on tariff revision.

7 Nov 2025

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Indian Railways Catering and Tourism Corporation Ltd. (IRCTC) and other parties, setting aside the Delh...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Commercial Contract Dispute — Joint and Several Liability of Holding Company and Subsidiary Upheld. Division Bench's restoration of award under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 affirmed, rejecting challenge on grounds of patent illegality and public policy.

3 Sep 2024

The case arises from a dispute between OPG Power Generation Private Limited (OPG) and its holding company Gita Power and Infrastructure Private Limite...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court: Promotional Trailers Do Not Create Contractual Obligations; No Deficiency in Service or Unfair Trade Practice. Creative Freedom in Art Protects Film Producers from Consumer Claims Regarding Missing Promotional Content.

22 Apr 2024

The Supreme Court addressed whether a promotional trailer creates a contractual obligation or leads to an unfair trade practice under the Consumer Pro...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Bona Fides of Insolvency Proceedings by Telecom Service Providers to Avoid AGR Dues. The Court held that AGR dues are final and no fresh disputes can be raised, and directed examination of whether insolvency proceedings under IBC are a subterfuge.

20 Jul 2020

The Supreme Court was hearing applications in the ongoing AGR dues matter, where the Union of India sought extension of time for payment. The Court ha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Railway Contract Dispute — Upholds Claims 1 and 4, Sets Aside Claims 5, 7, and 13 for Lack of Evidence and Non-Application of Mind. The court held that the arbitral tribunal failed to apply its mind to contractual provisions and evidence, rendering the award patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

6 May 2015

The Union of India (petitioner) filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a majority arbitral award...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Recovery of Principal with Reduced Interest in Bill Discounting Dispute — Interest Rate of 18% p.a. Granted from Due Date Instead of Claimed 30% p.a. The court held that the plaintiff is entitled to interest at 18% p.a. on the defaulted principal from the due date until suit, and thereafter at 6% p.a. pendente lite and future interest under Section 34 CPC.

20 Mar 2015

The plaintiff, Mahindra & Mahindra Limited, filed a summary suit against NEPC Micon Limited for recovery of Rs. 1.06 crores, comprising a principal su...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition in Commercial Dispute — Appointment of Sole Arbitrator under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court appoints retired judge as sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising from a Master Service Agreement between parties.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Zanmai Labs Private Limited, filed a Commercial Arbitration Petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, s...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions by Advocates Challenging Police Verification for Gun Licenses — No Fundamental Right to Carry Firearms. Requirement of Police Verification Under Arms Act, 1959 is a Reasonable Restriction and Not Arbitrary.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves five writ petitions filed by legal practitioners (advocates) challenging the requirement of police verification for grant of firearm...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)