Search Results for "contractor employee"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "contractor employee"

502 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 502 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Industrial Tribunal Award Directing Regularization of 24 Workmen in National Aerospace Laboratories — Workmen Held Not Entitled to Regularization as They Were Employed by Contractor, Not Principal Employer.

7 Jan 2015

The petitioner, Management of National Aerospace Laboratories (NAL), challenged the award dated 30-12-2005 of the Industrial Tribunal, Bengaluru in I....

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows BEML's Appeal in Canteen Workers' Regularisation Dispute — Contract Labour Not Absorbed Despite Canteen Being Statutory Obligation. The court held that without a notification under Section 10 of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970, contract labour cannot be deemed employees of the principal employer, and the Labour Court exceeded its jurisdiction by directing absorption.

12 Mar 2015

The case involves two appeals arising from a common order dated 16.04.2010 passed by a Single Judge of the Karnataka High Court in Writ Petition No. 3...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Employer Not Liable for Sub-Contractor's Employee's Injury. Employer-Employee Relationship Not Established Between Appellant and Injured Worker Under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

7 Jun 2023

The appellant, I.C.C. Ltd, represented by its proprietor Krishnakumar Bansilal Dhoot, filed an appeal under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation A...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Reinstatement of Contract Labourers in SAIL Mines Despite Finding Contract Genuine. High Court's Direction for Regularisation Consideration Under Para 125 of SAIL Judgment Affirmed, Back Wages Denied.

5 Jul 2019

The case involves a long-standing industrial dispute between the Steel Authority of India Ltd. (SAIL), a government undertaking, and the Ispat Khadan ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reference Order in Contract Labour Dispute — Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Reference of dispute regarding contract labourers to Industrial Tribunal without determining employer-employee relationship under Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 is bad in law.

1 Aug 2014

The petitioner, BASF India Ltd, a factory manufacturing construction chemicals, employed about 35 workmen directly and engaged contract labourers thro...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Labour Court Order in Industrial Dispute Regarding Canteen Workers' Status as Workmen of Principal Employer. Canteen workers employed through contractor held to be workmen of BEML Limited under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 due to statutory obligation to provide canteen.

12 Mar 2015

The case involves two appeals filed by BEML Limited (formerly Bharat Earth Movers Ltd.) and the President of Mysore Division General Labour Associatio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Workers' Appeal in Contract Labour Dispute — IPCA Laboratories Held Liable as Principal Employer Under Contract Labour Act. The court held that the Labour Enforcement Officer's complaint under Section 22A of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 was maintainable and that the company was the principal employer, rejecting the company's challenge to the cognizance order.

23 Nov 2022

The case involves two Letters Patent Appeals arising from a common order in Writ Petition No. 2791 of 2009. The appellants in LPA No. 270 of 2009 are ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Contract Dispute Between Contractor and Union of India — Condition 70 of GCC Provides for Arbitration of Disputes. The court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 after the respondent failed to appoint one despite notice.

22 Dec 2016

The applicant, M/s. Shanti Enterprises, a partnership firm engaged in construction, entered into a contract with the Union of India for addition/alter...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Commissioner's Order Under Section 10-A of Employees' Compensation Act, 1923 — Summary Deposit Cannot Be Ordered When Employer Denies Liability. Employer-Employee Relationship Disputed, Commissioner Must Follow Regular Procedure Under the Act.

11 Jun 2014

The Petitioner, Prompt Landmarks Pvt. Ltd., a construction company, challenged an order dated 4 May 2013 passed by the Commissioner for Workmen's Comp...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka hears civil miscellaneous petition seeking termination of existing arbitral tribunal and appointment of independent sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The dispute arises from a works contract where the contractor sought replacement of the arbitrator appointed by the department on grounds of bias and non-compliance with disclosure requirements.

11 Aug 2022

The petitioner, a contractor, was awarded a works contract by the Central Public Works Department (CPWD) for construction of a Sewage Treatment Plant....

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)