Search Results for "constructive possession"

364 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 364 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Review Order Deleting Possession Finding in Property Dispute. The High Court exceeded its review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC by deleting a finding on possession based on non-framing of issue, which was not an error apparent on the face of the record.

The Supreme Court allowed an appeal against the High Court's order in a review petition that deleted a paragraph from its earlier judgment in a proper...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Nigerian National in NDPS Case — 13-Year Rigorous Imprisonment Affirmed. Conscious possession of 2.5 kg heroin in checked-in baggage established; presumption under Section 35 NDPS Act not rebutted.

The appellant, Okacha Mike, a Nigerian national aged 68 years, was convicted by the Special Judge under the NDPS Act for offences punishable under Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Admiralty Suits as Time-Barred Under Limitation Act. Claims for Loss of Vessel and Cargo Filed Beyond Three-Year Limitation Period from Date of Vessel's Sinking.

The judgment concerns two admiralty suits filed in the Bombay High Court. Admiralty Suit No.3 of 2011 was filed by the time charterer of the vessel 'N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Decree of Possession and Mesne Profits to Purchasers in Suit for Ejectment of Trespassers Based on Title. Unregistered Agreement for Sale Does Not Confer Title or Right to Possession Without Payment of Consideration.

The plaintiffs, Sharad Shantilal Chheda and Taruna Anil Chheda, filed a suit in the Bombay High Court seeking a decree of possession and mesne profits...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Restores Trial Court's Decree for Mandatory Injunction. Court holds that the First Appellate Court's finding on possession was perverse and that the suit for mandatory injunction was not barred by laches.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the legal heirs of the original plaintiff, Shri Gurudas Yeshwant Pednekar, against the judgment of the Firs...