Search Results for "compromise order"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "compromise order"

1646 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1646 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Order Allowing Additional Evidence Under Order 18 Rule 4 CPC. Trial Court's Discretion to Permit Proof of Compromise Deed Executed After Evidence Closed Upheld as Not Perverse.

24 Jan 2018

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original defendant, challenged an order dated 10 March 2017 passed by the Civil Judge Junior Division, Khandala, i...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Consent Order Recording Settlement in Arbitration Challenge. Parties Bound by Compromise Under Order XXIII Rules 1 & 3 CPC; No Appeal Lies Against Consent Order.

5 Mar 2021

The appellant, Bhiwandi Nizampur City Municipal Corporation, entered into a contract with the respondent, M/s. Antony Waste Handling Cell Pvt. Ltd., f...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against High Court's Reversal in Wakf Compromise Decree Case — Commissioner's Notice Requirement Under Section 70(1) Bengal Wakfs Act, 1934, Satisfied by Impleading as Party. Compromise Decree Not Void Under Section 70(4) When Commissioner Had Full Notice of Suit and Opportunity to Contest.

15 Jul 1969

Background: The case involved a wakf al-al-aulad executed by Haji Abdul Karim in 1917, providing for family benefits and ultimately feeding the poor. ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction but Reduces Sentence in IPC Section 326 Case Based on Victim Compromise. The Court held that while the offence is non-compoundable under Section 320 CrPC, a compromise can be considered for sentencing purposes, reducing the imprisonment to the period already undergone due to the victim's forgiveness and restored family relations.

20 Sep 2021

The appeal arose from a criminal conviction under Section 326 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for causing grievous hurt. The appellant, along with oth...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Husband's Appeal in Hindu Marriage Act Divorce Case Based on Joint Compromise. Family Court Dismissal Set Aside and Divorce Granted in Terms of Compromise Memo Under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC.

24 Feb 2025

The appeal arose from the dismissal of a divorce petition by the Family Court, Namakkal. The appellant/husband had filed F.C.O.P.No.335 of 2022 under ...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Aurangabad Considers Civil Application Seeking Recall of Compromise Decree in Second Appeal No. 356 of 2001. Applicant Claims Prior Purchase of Suit Land and Alleges Fraud, Suppression, and Violation of Interim Orders.

30 Aug 2016

The applicant filed a civil application seeking recall of an order dated 23.12.2011 by which Second Appeal No.356 of 2001 was disposed of in terms of ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Compromise Decrees Passed Without Appointment of Representatives Under U.P. Court of Wards Act. Section 56 of the U.P. Court of Wards Act, 1912, Held to be Directory and Not Mandatory, Validating the Compromise Decrees.

14 Dec 1959

The dispute arose from two cross-suits between the appellant, proprietor of Ganeshpur Estate, and the respondent, proprietor of Ramnagar Estate, conce...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Compromise Decree in Civil Suit Due to Fraud and Non-Compliance with Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC — Suit Restored for Hearing on Merits. The court held that a compromise decree obtained without a written and signed compromise and without the court recording satisfaction about its lawfulness is illegal and liable to be set aside under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

9 Jun 2015

The petitioner, Kasturevva, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Dharwa...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Examines Executability of Compromise Decree in Eviction Suit under Maharashtra Rent Control Act. The court considers whether a compromise that does not refer to specific eviction grounds creates a fresh tenancy requiring new proceedings.

27 Jul 2022

The respondent-landlord filed a suit against the petitioner-tenants seeking eviction under Section 16(1)(e)(ii) and (g) of the Maharashtra Rent Contro...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Compromise Decree in Lok Adalat Due to Fraud and Non-Compliance with Legal Requirements. Petitioner, who was a minor at the time of compromise, was not represented by a guardian, rendering the decree void ab initio under Order 32 Rule 7 CPC.

18 Mar 2024

The petitioner, Smt. Pooja, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash a compromise decree dated 2...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)