Search Results for "common law rights"

5133 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5133 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Appeal Against Company Law Board Orders Refusing to Enforce Settlement Under Section 634A of Companies Act, 1956. The appeal challenged the binding nature of an order recording broad settlement when consent terms were unsigned and third-party interests were involved.

The appeal arose from two orders of the Company Law Board (CLB) dated 2 July 2004 and 13 September 2004, which held that an earlier CLB order dated 29...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Landowners’ Challenge to Land Acquisition Award and Corrigendum After 31 Years Due to Invalid Inclusion. Corrigendum Issued Without Statutory Power to Modify Final Award Beyond Reasonable Time Declared Void, and Award Excluding Landowners’ Land Not Binding.

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original landowner Late Ahamad Izzat Mohammed Hasham Dada, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2486 OF 2005

The suit was filed by shareholders of Spice Jet Ltd, a domestic airline company formerly known as Modi Luft, which had undergone several ownership cha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Trust Land Exchange Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Oral Exchange Agreement from 1956 Not Proved; Possession Not Established; Suit for Declaration and Injunction Dismissed.

The appellant, Shree Nootan Kelavani Mandal, a trust registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950, filed a Second Appeal under Section 100 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Section 36(4) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Restricting Legal Representation Without Consent. Employer Seeks to Quash Labour Court Order Barring Engagement of Advocate in Industrial Dispute Reference.

The petitioner, a company engaged in manufacturing, dismissed the respondent workman for misconduct after due process in August 2015. The workman rais...