Search Results for "co-parceners"

233 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 233 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit — Daughters Cannot Claim Share in Coparcenary Property Allotted to Father Before 20th December 2004. The Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 is prospective and does not affect partitions effected prior to the amendment.

The case involves a Regular First Appeal (RFA) filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) against the judgment and decree dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Court upholds trial and appellate court decrees granting 1/3rd share to plaintiffs in joint family property, rejecting defendants' claim of prior partition.

The present regular second appeal was filed by defendants No.1 to 6 (appellants) under Order XLII Rule 1 read with Section 100 of the Code of Civil Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Court holds that a co-owner in possession of joint family property cannot claim adverse possession against other co-owners unless there is ouster or denial of title.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the legal heirs of the original defendant No.1 (since deceased) against the judgment and decree dated 01.10...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010525052012_1

The litigation originated from a suit for partition and declaration filed by the plaintiff, D. Sujatha, against the legal representatives of the origi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal for Non-Prosecution in Partition Suit — Appellant Absent Despite Adjournments. Failure to Appear Leads to Dismissal Under Order XLI Rule 17 CPC.

The appellant, Domegunta Venkatasesha Reddy, filed a Regular First Appeal under the Partition Act before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru agai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Finding of No Common Property. Suit for partition and separate possession fails as plaintiff failed to prove that suit schedule properties were joint family properties.

The appellant, Domegunta Venkatasesha Reddy, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Revenue in Income Tax Reference on HUF Income Assessment. Income from assets received on partition by a bachelor remains individual income even after marriage, as no HUF is created without blending.

The case involves a reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal at the instance of the assessee, ...