High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal for Non-Prosecution in Partition Suit — Appellant Absent Despite Adjournments. Failure to Appear Leads to Dismissal Under Order XLI Rule 17 CPC.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Domegunta Venkatasesha Reddy, filed a Regular First Appeal under the Partition Act before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru against multiple respondents. The appeal was listed for hearing on 25th January 2019. On that date, the appellant was absent, and no representation was made on his behalf. The court noted that the matter had been adjourned on previous occasions to give the appellant an opportunity to argue, but he failed to appear. Consequently, the court dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution. No legal issues were argued or decided on merits.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Appeal - Dismissal for Non-Prosecution - The appellant failed to appear on multiple dates despite adjournments, leading to dismissal of the appeal for non-prosecution. (Para 1)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appeal should be dismissed for non-prosecution due to the appellant's failure to appear.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Law Points

  • Partition Act
  • 1893
  • Section 4
  • Non-prosecution
  • Dismissal for default
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (KAR) (01) 76

R.F.A. No.765/2014 (PAR)

2019-01-25

S. Sunil Dutt Yadav

Sri Sampat Anand Shetty (for appellant)

Domegunta Venkatasesha Reddy

Gowramma, Ramesh (deceased by legal heirs Manjula, Pawana, Yeshwanth), Srinivasa, Chandramma, Papamma, Venkatesh, Kenchamma, Narayan, Shama, Venkatappa, Peddanna, Venkataswamy, Nagaraju, N.M.Raju, Bharathi S. Alva, Renwick Angelo Masoarenhas, Satish Kumar Garg, T. Narayana, Gangamma, Chinnakka, Munimma (deceased by legal heirs Narayana, Venkataswamy)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Regular First Appeal under the Partition Act against a decree in a partition suit.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought to challenge the trial court's decree in a partition suit.

Filing Reason

Appellant was aggrieved by the decree passed in the partition suit.

Issues

Whether the appeal should be dismissed for non-prosecution.

Submissions/Arguments

No arguments were advanced as the appellant was absent.

Ratio Decidendi

An appeal may be dismissed for non-prosecution if the appellant fails to appear despite opportunities.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellant is absent and there is no representation. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed in 2014 and listed for hearing on 25th January 2019. On that date, the appellant was absent, leading to dismissal.

Acts & Sections

  • Partition Act, 1893:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case - Holding Period for Long-Term Capital Gains Determined by Section 2(42A) Explanation 1. Indexation Benefit Requires Asset Held for More Than 36 Months; Inherited Property's Holding Period ...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal for Non-Prosecution in Partition Suit — Appellant Absent Despite Adjournments. Failure to Appear Leads to Dismissal Under Order XLI Rule 17 CPC.