Search Results for "client margin stock"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "client margin stock"

49 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 49 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in Service Tax on Lottery Tickets Case — Holds That Service Tax on Promotion, Marketing, and Sale of Lottery Tickets Is Within Parliament's Competence Under Entry 97 List I Read With Article 248 of the Constitution, and Not Exclusively Within State's Domain Under Entry 62 List II. The Court upheld the constitutional validity of amendments to the Finance Act, 1994 levying service tax on services related to lotteries, reversing the Sikkim High Court's decision.

3 Mar 2025

The Supreme Court, in a batch of appeals led by Union of India v. Future Gaming Solutions Pvt. Ltd., considered the constitutional validity of amendme...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Challenge to NSE Appellate Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — Upholds Squaring Off of Client's Position Due to Margin Shortfall. Regulation 3.10 of NSE F&O Regulations Does Not Mandate Prior Written Notice Before Squaring Off; Award Based on Evidence.

6 Dec 2018

The Petitioner, M/s Shaunik Infotech Pvt Ltd, was a registered client of the Respondent, India Infoline Ltd, a trading member of the National Stock Ex...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Pledge Dispute Over Shares. Court Restrains Transfer of Pledged Shares and Orders Deposit of Surplus Sale Proceeds Pending Suit.

5 Feb 2014

The Plaintiff, Pushpanjali Tip Up Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit against Mrs. Renudevi Choudhary and others concerning shares pledged as security for loans. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against Remand Order in Arbitration Matters — Single Judge Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Section 34 by Setting Aside Award and Remanding for Reconsideration Without Finding Award to Be Void or Inoperative. The Court Held That Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Does Not Confer Power of Remand; Only Remedies Are to Uphold, Modify, or Set Aside the Award.

25 Jun 2013

The appellant, Geojit Financial Services Limited (now Geojit BNP Paribas Financial Services Limited), a stock broker registered with the National Stoc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Share Broker Dispute for Ignoring Material Evidence and NSE Bye-laws. The court held that the arbitrator's failure to consider the petitioner's evidence and the bye-laws rendered the award perverse and liable to be set aside under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

14 Mar 2013

The petitioner, M/s. Angel Capital & Debt Market Limited, a share broker, challenged an arbitral award dated 13 November 2009 passed by a sole arbitra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award Rejecting Counterclaim in Share Brokerage Dispute. Court upholds arbitral tribunal's finding that appellant failed to prove respondent's negligence in squaring off F&O contracts without notice.

24 Jul 2012

The appellant, Avalon Investment Private Limited, was a client of the respondent, Mukesh Brokerage & Financial Limited, a share broker registered with...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Brokerage Dispute — Upholds Award for Squaring Off Due to Margin Default. Member-Client Agreement and Electronic Contract Notes Establish Liability for Margin Shortfall Under Byelaws of Stock Exchange.

6 Mar 2012

The petitioner, Sizarali M. Dodhia, a constituent of the respondent, Angel Capital & Debt Market Ltd., entered into a member-client agreement on 21 Au...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Trading Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Found to be in Conflict with Public Policy or Suffering from Patent Illegality. The court held that the arbitrator's interpretation of the contract and byelaws was plausible and not perverse, and the award did not warrant interference.

11 Mar 2010

The petitioner, Rajendra Kumar Bothra, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbitral award d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Arbitral Awards in Stock Broking Disputes — Upholds Awards for Payment of Outstanding Dues with Interest. Claims of Bogus Trading and Unauthorized Transactions Remain Unproved Due to Lack of Evidence and Failure to Pursue Counterclaims.

15 Jan 2010

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions filed by Ms. Deepika Vijay Nihalani and Vijay Roopkumar Nihalani against INA Stock Broking Co. Pvt. Lt...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Trading Dispute — No Grounds Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act Established. Court upholds award holding petitioner liable for unauthorized trades and failure to prove respondent's instructions.

4 Jan 2010

The petitioner, Sytematix Shares & Stocks (India) Ltd., a stockbroker, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...

2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)