Search Results for "bribe"

749 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 749 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Demand. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Nathaji Tukaram Lohakare, a Talathi (village revenue officer), was convicted by the Special Judge, Solapur, for offences under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Gunwant Dhumbhare, a public servant, for offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Minimum Wages Inspector in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence on Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. State fails to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Anti Corruption Bureau, Buldana, appealed against the judgment and order dated 28/06/2000 passed by the Learned ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Forest Guard in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Khudaram Kshirsagar, a Forest Guard, who was charged under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Motor Vehicle Inspector in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 161 IPC and Section 5(1)(d) read with 5(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1948.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Balchandra Ramdas Jain, a Motor Vehicle Inspector, for offences under Section 161 IPC and S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Upholds Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration — Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Anti-Corruption Bureau, Buldhana, appealed against the judgment of the Special Judge, Buldhana, acquitting the r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Waman s/o Malhari Jambhulkar, was convicted by the Special Judge (Under Prevention of Corruption Act) and 4th Additional Sessions Judge...