Search Results for "block period"

2968 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2968 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Income Tax Department to Comply with ITAT Order and Release Seized Jewellery and Refund Within Six Weeks. Failure to Complete Block Assessment Within Limitation Under Section 158BE of Income Tax Act, 1961 Renders Retention of Seized Assets Illegal.

The petitioner, legal heir of Late Mr. Lakhpatrai Agarwal, filed a writ petition challenging the inaction of the Income Tax Department in complying wi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition Challenging Reopening Notice Under Section 148 for AY 2012-13 as Time-Barred. Notice Issued Beyond Six-Year Limit Under Section 149 After Search Under Section 132 on 08.09.2021.

The petitioner, Manojbhai Bhupatbhai Vadodaria, filed a writ petition challenging a notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010259352010_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging GST Registration Cancellation Without Notice. Cancellation of registration under Section 29 of CGST Act, 2017 set aside for violation of principles of natural justice as no show-cause notice was issued before cancellation.

The petitioner, Dee Vee Projects Ltd., a public limited company engaged in infrastructure development, was registered under the erstwhile State Sales ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for a Residential Layout. Petitioners Seek Quashing of Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout Under the Land Acquisition Act and BDA Act.

The provided judgment text is an incomplete excerpt containing only the listing of multiple writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes BBMP Recovery Demand Against Swimming Centre for Lack of Authority. Demand for Rs. 1,93,73,184 for alleged excess water consumption set aside as BBMP lacked jurisdiction to levy such charges under the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976.

The petitioner, M/S. PM Swimming Centre, a partnership firm, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010364002010_1

...