Search Results for "ballistic"

161 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 161 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Last Seen Theory. Appellants convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC for murder of Chhotu @ Surjeet, with recovery of weapons under Arms Act, 1959.

The case pertains to the murder of Chhotu @ Surjeet on 31.10.2001. The deceased was last seen with the appellants Shabbir and Ravi Mandal (along with ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Eyewitness Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC read with 34 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was an interested witness with material contradictions.

The case pertains to the murder of one person, for which the appellants (original accused Nos. 3 and 4) along with three other co-accused were tried. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The judgment pertains to a criminal appeal arising from a conviction for murder and other offences. The appellants, Rizwan Farooq Shaikh and Shoheb @ ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declaration and Hostile Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Dying Declaration Did Not Name Assailant and Recovery of Defective Weapon Raised Doubt.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Sudhir Kumar Jain against the judgment of the Rajasthan High Court affirming his conviction under Section 302 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence on Identification and Weapon. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove light source for identification and which firearm caused fatal injury.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Ashoksinh Jayendrasinh, setting aside his conviction under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 IPC, Section 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302, 307 IPC and Section 30 Arms Act set aside as medical and ballistic evidence contradicted the eyewitness account.

The case involves two criminal appeals arising from a judgment dated 29.12.2006 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Satara in Sessions Case No.53...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Evidence and Lack of Common Object. Conviction under Section 302 read with 149 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove unlawful assembly and common object beyond reasonable doubt.

The judgment pertains to multiple criminal appeals arising from a conviction for murder under Section 302 read with 149, 120B, 147, 148 of the Indian ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused Under Section 122 IPC for Preparation to Wage War Against Government of India. Possession of Arms Without Licence Under Arms Act Also Upheld.

The appellants, Javed @ Java Ahmed Mohammed Akbar Bhatt and others, were convicted by the trial court under Section 122 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC)...