Search Results for "balance payment"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "balance payment"

4841 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4841 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petition in Commission Dispute. Debt Held Bona Fide Disputed Under Sections 433(e) and 434 of Companies Act, 1956.

6 Jun 2017

The petitioner, Total Sports & Entertainment India Pvt. Ltd., filed a winding up petition under Sections 433(e) and (f) and 434 of the Companies Act, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds DRAT Order Allowing One Time Settlement in Debt Recovery Case — Interest Must Be Calculated as Per OTS Terms. The court held that the DRT erred in not giving effect to the OTS and in calculating interest beyond the OTS terms, and the DRAT correctly set aside the DRT order.

10 Jul 2019

The petitioners, Small Industries Development Bank of India (SIDBI) and India SME Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd., challenged an order dated 26th Ma...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Bank's Petition for Commission on Guarantees Issued to Court — Canara Bank Entitled to 3% Commission on Guarantees in Favour of Prothonotary and Senior Master. The court held that a bank issuing guarantees at the request of a customer is entitled to commission as per its standard terms, and the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal erred in denying such commission.

6 May 2014

The petitioner, Canara Bank, a body corporate constituted under the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970, filed a wr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Union of India's Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act, 1996 Against Arbitral Award — Dispute Over Transportation Charges and Detention Claims for Fighter Tanks.

20 Apr 2015

The Union of India filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbitral award dated 4 October 2012....

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Winding Up Petition Against Company for Non-Payment of Debt. Debt of JPY 64,516,217 admitted by balance confirmation and part payment, no bona fide dispute raised under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956.

20 Jul 2016

The Petitioner, Manjiro Works, a proprietory concern in the business of supplying gaming machines, filed a Company Petition under Sections 433(e) and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Application to Sell Matrimonial Home and Directs Husband to Pay EMIs in Family Court Dispute. The court held that the husband is liable to pay EMIs as maintenance and the wife may sell the property with court supervision to protect the matrimonial home from bank action under the Securitisation Act.

20 Mar 2013

The writ petition arose from an order of the Family Court No.7, Mumbai dated 23rd August 2011, which rejected the wife's application for direction to ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award on Termination and Repudiation of Master Asset Purchase Agreement. Arbitrator's Finding of Repudiation by Purchaser and Direction for Refund of Consideration under MAPA Considered.

10 May 2013

The dispute arose from a Master Asset Purchase Agreement (MAPA) dated 31st March 2005 between Siddhivinayak Realties Pvt. Ltd. as purchaser and V Hote...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petitions Against Partial Arbitral Awards in Koyna Hydro Electric Project Sub-Contract Dispute. Challenge to awards failing on grounds of settlement and coercion under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

8 Jan 2016

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by Patel Engineering Co. Ltd. (th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Agreement to Sell Dispute — Rescission of Contract and Possession Granted. Appellant entitled to rescind agreement and recover possession as respondent failed to prove readiness and willingness to perform contract under Section 53A of Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

21 Mar 2022

The appellant, Kishan Ghorpade, filed a suit for rescission of an agreement to sell dated 17.06.1978 and for possession of the suit property, claiming...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Seeking Refund of Pre-deposit in VAT Matter — Mandamus Issued for Release of Rs. 16,11,19,226/- and Interest on Delayed Refund. Petitioner entitled to refund of pre-deposit amount with interest under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

16 Jul 2025

The petitioner, M/s. Flipkart India Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus d...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)