Search Results for "award under 1894 Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "award under 1894 Act"

1147 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1147 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Liability for Supplementary Award Rests with Original Beneficiary, Not Transferee Company. Scheme of Arrangement Under Sections 391-394 of Companies Act, 1956 Does Not Transfer Contingent Liabilities of Pending Acquisition Proceedings.

20 Sep 2024

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by M/s Ultra-Tech Cement Ltd. against the order of the Himachal Pradesh High Court dated 12.07.2022. The Hi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Land Acquisition Case — Compensation Enhancement for Agricultural Land Under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Court holds that the Reference Court erred in not granting statutory benefits under Section 23(1A) and Section 23(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and that the acquired land was agricultural, not non-agricultural, entitling the claimants to higher compensation.

22 Dec 2023

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original landowner Bhagirathibai Shivgonda Patil, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment of the Reference ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Acquisition Award for Non-Compliance with 2013 Act — Mandamus Issued for Fresh Award Under Section 26. Land Acquisition Proceedings Initiated Under 1894 Act but Award Passed After 2013 Act Came into Force Must Comply with Compensation Provisions of 2013 Act.

29 Aug 2023

The petitioner, M/s. Deco Equipments Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash an awar...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows DDA Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case: Deposit of Compensation with Reference Court Constitutes Payment Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013. The Court held that where compensation is deposited with the Reference Court due to ownership disputes, it satisfies the payment requirement and prevents lapse of acquisition.

1 May 2023

The case involves an appeal by the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) against a High Court order declaring that the acquisition of land had lapsed unde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions for Enhanced Compensation and Apportionment in Land Acquisition Matter. Petitioner, as legal heir, entitled to enhanced compensation under Sections 26-30 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 read with Section 24(1)(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

24 Mar 2023

The petitioner, Faizal Ismail Sutar, filed two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court. In Writ Pet...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Land Acquisition for Pimpri-Chinchwad New Town Development Authority — Compensation Enhancement Granted. Landowners entitled to higher compensation under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for acquisitions under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

7 Aug 2019

The judgment involves three writ petitions filed by landowners and a developer challenging land acquisition proceedings initiated by the Pimpri-Chinch...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Division Bench Judgment on Interpretation of Section 24 Proviso in Land Acquisition Act. The proviso to Section 24 of the 2013 Act governs Section 24(2), not Section 24(1)(b), as held in Delhi Metro Rail Corporation v. Tarun Pal Singh.

27 Feb 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals challenging the Division Bench judgment in Delhi Metro Rail Corporation v. Tarun Pal Singh, which held that th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case for Enhancement of Compensation — Reference Court Erred in Dismissing Petition for Want of Prosecution Without Considering Merits. The High Court directed restoration of the reference petition under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, for fresh adjudication on merits.

18 Jun 2018

The appellant, Vitthal Madan Patil, was the owner of land bearing Survey No. 39/6 admeasuring 01 Hectare 60 R situated at village Kolsur, Taluka Omerg...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Enhances Compensation for Acquired Land. Court holds that the Reference Court erred in dismissing the reference for default without considering the merits, and remands the matter for fresh adjudication under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

18 Jun 2018

The appellant, Shivaji Pandurang Bansode, filed a first appeal against the judgment and award dated 25-02-2013 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Divis...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Airport Development — Acquisition Not Vitiated by Delay or Non-Compliance with Section 5A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Petitioners failed to demonstrate that the acquisition was for a purpose other than public purpose or that the procedure under the Act was not followed.

5 May 2017

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by M/s. Suretech Hospital & Research Centre Limited and M/s. Vighnaharta Builders and Developers challe...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)