Search Results for "attachment orders"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "attachment orders"

665 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 665 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows CENVAT Credit on Mobile Towers and Prefabricated Buildings for Mobile Service Providers — Interprets 'Capital Goods' and 'Inputs' Under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Mobile towers and PFBs are essential for providing telecom services and qualify as capital goods or inputs under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

22 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court of India adjudicated a batch of appeals concerning the eligibility of mobile service providers (MSPs) to claim CENVAT credit on exci...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Property Owners Against Attachment Under MPID Act — Property Not Proceeds of Crime. The court held that property owned by third parties not accused cannot be attached merely because the accused was in possession under a leave and licence agreement.

15 Dec 2023

The appellants, Smt. Madhu Deepak Gogri and Mayank Deepak Gogri, are the owners of Shop Nos. 1 and 2 in Prem Bhanu Apartment, Borivali (West). The pro...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Holds Police Cannot Seize Immovable Property Under Section 102 CrPC. The expression 'any property' in Section 102(1) CrPC means only movable property, and immovable property cannot be seized by police during investigation.

9 Aug 2019

The Supreme Court in this judgment resolved a long-standing conflict of opinion in the Bombay High Court regarding the interpretation of Section 102 o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Admiralty Suits as Time-Barred Under Limitation Act. Claims for Loss of Vessel and Cargo Filed Beyond Three-Year Limitation Period from Date of Vessel's Sinking.

17 Sep 2018

The judgment concerns two admiralty suits filed in the Bombay High Court. Admiralty Suit No.3 of 2011 was filed by the time charterer of the vessel 'N...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Sales Tax Attachment on Property Purchased in SARFAESI Auction — Priority of Secured Creditor Over Crown Debt. Attachment order set aside as property was sold by secured creditor under SARFAESI Act before attachment, and sales tax dues do not have priority over secured creditor's rights under Section 26E of SARFAESI Act.

16 Oct 2015

The petitioners, Sherwood Resorts Pvt. Ltd. and its shareholder, challenged an attachment order dated 29th April 2013 passed by the Sales Tax Officer ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Auction Sale of Mortgaged Property for Non-Compliance with Recovery Rules. Court holds that failure to serve notice of sale proclamation on the judgment-debtor at his updated address vitiates the sale, but the petitioners failed to approach the Recovery Officer under Rule 61 of the Second Schedule to the Income Tax Act, 1961 within the prescribed period or seek condonation of delay with sufficient cause.

10 Jun 2015

The petitioners, M/s. Hotel Paras Garden and its proprietor Prabhakar Digambar Lande, challenged the auction sale of their mortgaged property conducte...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Attachment Order in Defamation Suit Execution — Attachment of Immovable Property Without Notice to Judgment Debtor Violates Order XXI Rule 54 CPC. Court holds that issuance of attachment warrant without prior notice to the judgment debtor and without recording reasons is illegal and liable to be set aside.

4 Sep 2013

The petitioner, Dilipkumar Hirachand Jain, was the original plaintiff No.2 in Special Civil Suit No.332 of 1996, which was a suit for damages for defa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Restricts Provisional Attachment to Disputed Amount in MVAT Act Case — Section 48(5) Constitutional Challenge Rejected. Court holds that attachment under Section 35 must be proportionate, and directs respondents to limit attachment to Rs.1.81 crores.

30 Apr 2012

The petitioner, M/s. Premium Paper and Board Industries Ltd., a registered dealer under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 (MVAT Act) and the C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Recovery Certificate Satisfaction Orders in Cooperative Bank Dispute. Special Recovery Officer lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate on validity of recovery certificates or order refund under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

4 Oct 2011

The petitioners, M/s. Vilas Transport Co., a partnership firm, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging two or...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Immunity of Provident Fund Amounts from Attachment Under Section 3(1) of Provident Funds Act, 1925. Attachment of Money Held by Reserve Bank for Transmission Abroad Declared Contrary to Law as Railway Administration was Trustee.

6 Dec 1968

The dispute arose from execution proceedings against a retired railway employee, B, who had subscribed to the State Railway Provident Fund and opted f...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)