Search Results for "asset diversion"

43 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 43 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commercial Arbitration Dispute. Court upholds award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding no patent illegality or conflict with public policy.

The petitioner, Ramakrishnan Krishnan, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Challenging DICGC Act Provisions in Cooperative Bank Deposit Insurance Dispute. Sections 18A(5) and 21(3)(4) of the Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation Act, 1961, held constitutional and not arbitrary.

The appellant, Sri G.K. Gururaja Rao, Secretary of Sri Guru Raghavendra Sahakara Bank Niyamitha, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Consti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Complaints for Dishonour of Cheques Due to Lack of Proper Service of Demand Notice Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Service of notice by speed post or courier must be proved by cogent evidence; mere dispatch is insufficient.

The Bombay High Court disposed of a batch of petitions and applications under Section 482 CrPC and Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Arrest Order Against Guarantors in DRT Recovery Proceedings — Recovery Officer Cannot Order Arrest Without Prior Notice and Hearing Under Section 25 of RDDBFI Act, 1993

The petitioners, Kishor K. Mehta and Rajesh K. Mehta, were directors and guarantors of Beautiful Diamonds Company Limited, which had availed loan faci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Invalidity of Partnership Between HUF Karta and Its Member in Income Tax Registration Case. Partnership Deed Between Karta and Coparcener of Same HUF Held Void as No Valid Contract Possible Under Section 4 of Indian Partnership Act, 1932.

The case pertains to an Income Tax Reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, arising from the order of the Income Tax Appellate Trib...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NCLAT Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Section 7 Application for CIRP — Claimants Failed to Prove Debt and Default. The Tribunal held that the Appellants did not establish the existence of a financial debt or default, and the application was barred by limitation.

The present appeal was filed by Vistra ITCL (India) Limited, Pratiti Trading Private Limited, and Gajendra Investment Limited (Appellants) against the...