Search Results for "area restriction removal"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "area restriction removal"

372 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 372 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Public Interest Litigation Challenging CIDCO Plot Allotments — Allegations of Fictitious Societies Grabbing Plots at Fixed Rates. The validity of allocations under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 and CIDCO Regulations depends on the genuineness of the housing societies.

23 Nov 2005

The Public Interest Litigation was instituted by Public Concern for Governance Trust, a registered charitable trust, against the State of Maharashtra,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Dredging Contract Dispute — Interest Award Modified and Counterclaim Allowed. The court held that the arbitral tribunal's award of interest from the date of the award rather than from the date of the claim was contrary to Section 31(7)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and that the rejection of the employer's counterclaim for demobilization costs under Clause 73(1) was perverse.

15 May 2020

The judgment concerns two cross petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging a majority arbitral award arising...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Public Interest Litigation Petition Challenging Construction of Residential Building and Public Parking Lot under DCR and MRTP Act — Court Examines Legality of Approvals and Concessions Granted by Municipal Commissioner. The Court Considers Whether Circular Restricting Public Parking Lots to Four Floors Overrides Provisions of DCR 33(24) and Implications of Notices under Sections 51 and 53(1) of MRTP Act.

13 May 2013

The Public Interest Litigation petition filed in 2012 before the Bombay High Court challenged the legality of approvals and construction of a 56‑sto...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by State and Corporation in Bombay Municipal Corporation Act Case; Upholds Provisions Requiring Deposit of Carcasses Without Sale. Provisions Are Reasonable Restrictions Under Articles 19(1)(f) and (g) and Not Acquisitions Requiring Compensation Under Article 31(2) as They Prevent Danger to Public Health Under Article 31(5)(b)(ii).

15 Oct 1968

The case arose from a constitutional challenge to certain provisions of the Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, as amended by Act 14 of 1961, whic...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Constitutionality of Prohibitory Orders Under Section 144 CrPC Restricting Public Assembly. Judgment Clarifies That Reasonable Restrictions on Speech and Assembly Must Be Just, Fair and Reasonable Under Articles 19 and 21.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court initiated a suo motu criminal writ petition regarding the incident at Ramlila Maidan on 4-5 June 2011, involving the imposition of p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Challenge to Unilateral Deemed Conveyance Certificate Under MOFA Section 11 — Competent Authority Cannot Incorporate Third-Party Rights Created by Documents Other Than Section 4 Agreement. Court Directs Removal of Such References from Certificate While Relegating Parties to Civil Suit.

8 Mar 2024

The Petitioner, Riddhi Gardens Building No. A1, A2 Co-operative Housing Society Limited, challenged a certificate of unilateral deemed conveyance issu...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Pronounces Order in Writ Petition Challenging Reservation in Government Tenders for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. Petitioner Asserts that Amendment to Section 6 of Karnataka Transparency in Public Procurements Act, 1999 and Insertion of Rule 27(A) Providing 17.15% and 6.95% Reservation for SC/ST in Works up to ₹50 Lakhs Violates Constitutional Rights.

20 Dec 2019

The petitioner, a Class-I contractor enrolled with the Karnataka Public Works Department since 2008-09, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 2...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Removal of Muthavalli in Wakf Dispute — Civil Court Acting as Kazi Has Jurisdiction to Remove Muthavalli Under Muslim Law. The court held that the Principal City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore, acting as Kazi, had the power to remove a Muthavalli for breach of trust and mismanagement, and the impugned order did not suffer from any jurisdictional error.

12 Aug 2014

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging a common order dated 23.4.2011 pas...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Considers Challenge to Levy of VAT on Liquor by Certain Licensees; Alleged Discrimination Between Different Categories of Excise Licence Holders. Petitioners Contend That Notification Exempting Some Dealers While Taxing Others Violates Articles 14, 19, and 304B of the Constitution.

30 Sep 2015

The writ petitions were filed by various licensees under the Karnataka Excise Act, 1967, challenging the constitutional validity of Entry No.59A of th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates PIL and Writ Petitions on Hoarding Permissions on Airport Land. Petitioners Allege Non-Compliance with MMC Act, 1888 Sections 328 and 328A and CRZ Regulations.

1 Mar 2018

A public interest litigation and two writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the erection of hoardings by an advertising co...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)