Search Results for "arbitrator misconduct"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "arbitrator misconduct"

171 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 171 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Arbitral Award in Construction Subcontract Dispute. Petition filed by main contractor against subcontractor's award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

21 Mar 2013

Patel Engineering Co. Ltd (PEC) challenged an arbitral award dated 25 January 2010 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Civil Appeal in Arbitration Dispute, Restoring Arbitral Award Modified by Lower Courts. Judicial Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is Limited, and Courts Cannot Re-appreciate Evidence or Modify Awards on Merits.

4 Jan 2024

The dispute arose from a construction contract between a civil engineering contractor and the Karnataka State Public Works Department for building off...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Patent Illegality and Violation of Natural Justice. Award declared firm dissolved on a date not claimed by any party and failed to consider crucial evidence regarding partnership property.

5 Jun 2017

The Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenges an arbitral award dated 1st August 2006. The petiti...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Challenge to Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act in Property Development Dispute. Petitioners Argue Award is Unreasoned and Arbitrator Failed to Independently Analyze Submissions, Seeking Set Aside.

19 Nov 2025

Background: The matter involved a property development dispute concerning three tribal (Adivasi) lands in Malad, Mumbai. The petitioners were legal he...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in ATM Cash Replenishment Dispute. The petition challenges the award of Rs. 23.26 crores to the respondent for cash loading discrepancies under the 2010 and 2015 agreements.

23 Dec 2025

The judgment originates from a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by Securitrans India Private Limited, see...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Share Purchase Dispute — Upholds Majority Award on Misrepresentation of Receivables. The court held that the arbitral tribunal's findings on misrepresentation and damages were not perverse and did not warrant interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

16 Mar 2012

The petitioner, GWL Properties Ltd. (formerly Gordon Woodroffe Ltd.), challenged a majority arbitral award dated 31 August 2009 under Section 34 of th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Arbitration Petitions Challenging Arbitral Award in Dispute Over Supply of Pulverised Fly Ash from Thermal Power Plant. The petitions, filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seek to set aside the award that rejected claims for specific performance and damages arising from an agreement dated 4 October 2000.

24 Jul 2014

The dispute arose from a long-term agreement dated 4 October 2000 between Dirk India Private Limited (Dirk India) and Maharashtra State Electricity Ge...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to Arbitral Award in Tripartite Agreement Dispute Over Warehousing Charges — Handwritten Insertion of 'Per Month' Not Binding Without Consent. The court upheld the arbitrator's finding that the handwritten insertion was not part of the agreement and that the award was not contrary to public policy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

28 Jan 2014

The dispute arose from a tripartite agreement dated 18 May 2004 between Essar Oils Limited (Petitioner), Central Warehousing Corporation (Respondent N...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute. Court upholds single judge's refusal to set aside award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that findings of fact by arbitrator are not open to challenge.

22 Feb 2005

The Union of India (appellant) had invited tenders for construction work, and Moti Enterprises (respondent) was the successful tenderer. The contract ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses ONGC's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Vessel Maintenance Contract Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Found to be in Conflict with Public Policy or Patent Illegality. The court upheld the arbitral tribunal's interpretation that the respondent was not liable for pre-existing HOTO defects, as the contract did not impose such liability.

18 Oct 2010

The petitioner, Oil & Natural Gas Corpn. Ltd. (ONGC), challenged an arbitral award dated 2nd April, 2008 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conci...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)