Search Results for "arbitration mandate extension"

229 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 229 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Commercial Court Order on Arbitration Time Extension Application. Commercial Court Erred in Declining Jurisdiction Over Section 29A Application Based on Arbitrator Appointment Method Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 22.08.2025 passed by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Finding of Waiver of Right to Object to Time Extension in Arbitration Proceedings. Held that Participation in Proceedings Without Insisting on Time Limit Constitutes Waiver of Right to Object to Extension of Time.

The appeal arises from a dispute between partners of a partnership firm (appellants) and a company (respondent) regarding an arbitration agreement dat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Under Section 14(2) of Arbitration Act, Setting Aside Arbitrator's Termination of Proceedings for Delay in Filing Statement of Claim. Arbitrator's Refusal to Condoned Minimal Delay and Termination Held Arbitrary and Amounting to De Jure Inability to Act.

The petitioners, original claimants in arbitral proceedings, filed a petition under Section 14(2) and Section 32(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliatio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Violation of Mandatory Time Limit Under NSEIL Byelaws. Award passed beyond six-month period without extension provision is illegal and liable to be quashed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Petitioner, a constituent, challenged an arbitral award dated 19 September 2009 passed by a panel of Arbitrators appointed under the Byelaws, Rule...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition Challenging Award on Share Sale Proceeds. Court upholds arbitrator's finding that petitioner signed mandate letter for sale of shares and loan repayment, rejecting allegations of fraud and forgery.

The petitioner, Jackie Kukubhai Shroff, and the respondent, Ratnam Sudesh Iyer, were shareholders in Atlas Equipfin Pvt. Ltd. (Atlas), which held shar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds Arbitral Award in Favor of Oil Corporation in Kerosene Supply Contract Dispute. Arbitrator Had Rejected Limitation Defense Under Contractual Clause and Held Clause Not Void Under Section 28 of Indian Contract Act.

The matter arose from an arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by the original respondent in the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Commercial Arbitration Appeal on Arbitrator Ineligibility Under Section 12(5) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act. Consent to Appointment of Managing Director as Sole Arbitrator Raises Question of Waiver and Patent Illegality.

The dispute arose from an agreement dated 30 October 2013 between the appellant, a contractor, and the respondent, a private limited company engaged i...