Search Results for "administrative routine"

172 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 172 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Article 227 Cannot Override Order VII Rule 11 CPC | Supreme Court Restores Plaint Wrongly Struck Off by High Court (2026 INSC 121)

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in striking off the plaint under Article 227 of the Constitution when a specific remedy under Order V...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Dismisses Second Appeal Due to Unexplained Delay of 169 Days. Bureaucratic Delays Not Sufficient Cause for Condonation of Delay Under Section 24A of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a second appeal filed by the Sub Post Master, Gandhinagar, against Meenaben Bhaw...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Dismisses Second Appeal Due to 399-Day Delay — Condonation Denied for Lack of Sufficient Cause. Internal administrative delays and employee turnover held not sufficient to explain each day of delay under Section 51 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a second appeal filed by SBI General Insurance Company Ltd. against an order of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against Government Officer in Corruption Case — Lack of Sanction Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Private Complaint Filed Without Prior Sanction for Prosecution of Public Servant is Not Maintainable.

The petitioner, Dr. Ashok V., a District Officer in the Backward Classes Welfare Department, challenged an order dated 07.12.2021 passed by the Princi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employee's Petition Challenging Transfer from Navi Mumbai to Mysore. Transfer Order Upheld as Valid Exercise of Employer's Right Under Contract of Service.

The petitioner, Uday Shantikumar Dixit, joined Larsen & Toubro Ltd. (respondent no.1) on 23rd November 1981 as an Assistant Draughtsman and was later ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Transfer of Group A Railway Officer — Transfer Order Upheld as Administrative Necessity. Petitioner's All India Service Liability and Lack of Malice Justify Transfer Under Railway Establishment Rules.

The petitioner, Naresh K. Gupta, a Group A officer serving as Ex-Chief Engineer (Construction and Survey) at the Western Railway Headquarters in Mumba...