Search Results for "acquisition steps"

624 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 624 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Land Acquisition for Road Widening Due to Delay and Laches. Acquisition Notification Under Section 4(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Upheld as Valid and for Public Purpose.

The case involves a batch of writ petitions filed by shop owners and residents of Byadagi town, Haveri district, challenging the land acquisition proc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Land Reservation for Public Garden in Kolhapur Development Plan. Reservation under Section 22 of MRTP Act, 1966 for public garden upheld as valid and not arbitrary, rejecting claims of delay and hardship.

The judgment concerns two connected matters: a writ petition filed by 15 members of the Jamsandekar family and a public interest litigation filed by P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Quash Land Reservations in Development Plan for Non-Acquisition Within Ten Years Under Section 127 of MRTP Act. Reservation for MSEB extension and school/playground lapsed due to failure to acquire land within statutory period.

The petitioner, Vikramsinh Jaysingrao Ghatge, owned land bearing R.S.No.247/2/1 admeasuring 3 hectares at Kagal, District Kolhapur. The Government of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Land Reservations in Development Plan Under MRTP Act. Reservations for MSEB Extension and School/Playground Quashed as Not Acquired Within 10 Years, Land Deemed De-reserved.

The petitioner, Vikramsinh Jaysingrao Ghatge, owned land bearing R.S.No.247/2/1 admeasuring 3 hectares at Kagal, District Kolhapur. The Government of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landowner's Petition for Release of Land from Reservation Under MRTP Act Due to Non-Acquisition for Over 45 Years. Land Reserved for Garden and Ring Road Since 1958 Deemed Released as Authority Failed to Act Within Six Months of Section 127 Notice.

The petitioner, Rajendra Rameshwardas Gindodiya, owned land Survey No.569/1 admeasuring 2 hectares and 12 ares in Dhule, which was ancestral property....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reservation on Land Due to Mapping Error and Non-Acquisition. The court quashed the reservation on the petitioner's land as the reservation chart showed a different survey number and no acquisition steps were taken for decades.

The petitioner, an agriculturist aged 77, is a joint owner of agricultural land Gat No. 933 (Old Survey No. 212/1) admeasuring 15R. In 1981, responden...