Search Results for "Vedanta"

117 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 117 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Limitation of Liability Clause in Arbitration Case — Clause 49.5 Bars Damages for Employer Delay. Contractual prohibition on claiming damages for employer-caused delay held valid and enforceable under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The dispute arose from a construction contract between M/s. C & C Constructions Ltd. (appellant) and IRCON International Ltd. (respondent) for buildin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitral Tribunal in EPC Contract Dispute — Respondent Failed to Respond to Invocation of Arbitration Clause. Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as Respondent Did Not Object to Appointment Despite Notice.

The applicant, Vedanta Limited, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an Arbitra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Steel Plant Operation Under Pollution Board Supervision Pending Environmental Clearance Compliance. The Court held that the High Court erred in discontinuing interim orders allowing operation under Board supervision, balancing environmental protection with livelihood concerns.

The case involves Electrosteel Steels Limited, which owns a 1.5 MTPA integrated steel plant in Bokaro, Jharkhand, employing 3,000 regular and 7,000 co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by MIDC in Contract Breach Case — No Binding Contract Without Work Order. Mere acceptance of tender does not create contractual obligations; formal work order essential under tender conditions.

The case involves an appeal by the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) against a decree passed in Special Civil Suit No.99/2009, whe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reservation on Land Due to Mapping Error and Non-Acquisition. The court quashed the reservation on the petitioner's land as the reservation chart showed a different survey number and no acquisition steps were taken for decades.

The petitioner, an agriculturist aged 77, is a joint owner of agricultural land Gat No. 933 (Old Survey No. 212/1) admeasuring 15R. In 1981, responden...