Search Results for "Vague pleadings"

890 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 890 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Amendment to DCR 33(7) Appendix III for Lack of Locus Standi and Bonafides. Petitioner failed to establish any public interest or personal injury, leading to dismissal with costs.

The petitioner, Mr. Imran Suleman Qureshi, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Bombay High Court challenging an amendment dated 21/05/2011...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Election Petition Challenging Lok Sabha Election of Nitin Gadkari for Non-Disclosure of Cause of Action. Petition under Section 80 read with Section 100(1)(d)(iv) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 fails as material facts not pleaded.

The petitioner, Manohar @ Sagar Pundlik Dabrase, filed an election petition under Section 80 read with Section 100(1) of the Representation of the Peo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Upholds Rejection of Amendment to Written Statement in Eviction Suit; No Due Diligence Shown After Commencement of Trial. Tenant's Application to Add Waiver Plea Based on Municipal Tax Payments Fails Under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC as Knowledge of Tax Payments Existed Throughout.

The matter arose from a suit for eviction and mesne profits filed by the landlord against the tenant in the Small Causes Court at Mumbai. The landlord...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Upholds Maintainability of Suit on Valuation for Court Fee and Jurisdiction in Patent Ownership Dispute. Suit Valuation at Plaintiff's Discretion Under Sections 8 and 9 Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959, Cannot Be Overruled Absent Evidence of Incorrect Valuation.

The suit was filed by Jer Rutton Kavasmaneck and another against Gharda Chemicals Ltd. and others seeking declarations, injunctions, and accounts rega...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Winding Up Petition Under the Companies Act, 1956, on Grounds of Loss of Substratum and Insolvency Due to Quashing of 2G Licenses; Final Disposition Not Extracted. Allegations of Dysfunctional Board and Insolvency Form Basis of Just and Equitable Winding Up Claim.

This Company Petition was filed by Etisalat Mauritius Ltd. (Petitioner), a wholly owned subsidiary of Emirates Telecommunications Corporation, seeking...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Husband and In-Laws in Dowry Harassment Case Due to Vague Allegations. General and Omnibus Allegations Without Specific Instances of Cruelty or Dowry Demand Do Not Attract Section 498-A IPC.

The applicants, who are the husband (applicant no.1), mother-in-law (applicant no.2, aged 74 and bedridden), and two brothers-in-law (applicants 3 and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Reject Election Petition Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Court Finds Petition Discloses Cause of Action and Material Facts for Corrupt Practices Allegations Under Representation of People Act, 1951.

The proceeding arose from an election petition filed under the Representation of People Act, 1951, challenging the election of the returned candidate ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking CBI/ED Investigation into Alleged Financial Irregularities by Political Figures. Petition fails to establish prima facie case for transfer of investigation to central agencies.

The petitioners, Gouri Abhay Bhide and Abhay Bhide, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court seeking a writ of mandamus d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Second Appeal in Suit for Declaration and Injunction Involving Allegation of Fraudulent Sale by Forged Power of Attorney. The Appeal Challenges Reversal of Trial Court's Decree by First Appellate Court.

Background: This matter arises from a Regular Second Appeal filed by the plaintiff under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging...