Search Results for "Unauthorised Occupation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Unauthorised Occupation"

280 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 280 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Union of India Challenging CAT Order Quashing Recovery of Damage Rent Without Show Cause Notice. Recovery of Damage Rent from Employee's Salary Without Prior Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice, Even if Facts of Unauthorised Occupation Are Undisputed.

30 Aug 2018

The Union of India and another (petitioners) challenged the judgment and order dated 10.11.2005 of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Mumbai, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging Maintainability of Civil Suit for Declaration of Ownership. Trial Court's Decision on Preliminary Issue Upheld as It Involves Mixed Questions of Law and Fact Not Amenable to Summary Adjudication.

24 Apr 2018

The Union of India, through the Deputy Salt Commissioner, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order da...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Registered Suo Motu by Police Under MRTP Act — Police Officer Lacks Authority to Register FIR Under Section 154 CrPC for Offences Under Sections 43 and 52 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966

17 Feb 2011

The petitioner, Mahesh Shivram Puthran, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an FIR registered by the poli...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Demand Notice for Unauthorized Change of Land Use in Leasehold Property — Petitioners Not Liable for Unauthorized Use by Tenant Without Prior Permission. Leasehold Property Dispute Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 — Demand for Additional Premium and Penalty Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice.

18 Oct 2006

The petitioners, Tulsiram Rangwala Trust, Rikhiram T. Arora, and Shivram Enterprises (India) Pvt. Ltd., challenged a demand notice dated 30th March 20...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Port Trust to Seize and Dispose of Third-Party Goods Under Section 6 of Public Premises Act. The Court held that Section 6 of the PP Act is independent of the Major Port Trusts Act and permits disposal of goods found on public premises even if they belong to third parties without privity of contract.

21 Feb 2019

The Supreme Court considered appeals arising from a Full Bench reference of the Calcutta High Court concerning the interpretation of Section 6 of the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Direction for Payment of Rent During Pendency of Eviction Appeals Under Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961. The court interpreted Section 13 to allow appellate courts to impose conditions like payment of reasonable rent as a term for stay of eviction, especially when eviction is decreed on grounds other than rent default.

22 Feb 2022

The appeals involved common questions regarding the interpretation of Section 13 of the Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961, in the context...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Eviction Proceedings Under Public Premises Act Against Pre-Nationalisation Tenants. Pre-nationalisation tenants cannot be treated as unauthorised occupants under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971, and the Estate Officer who recommended eviction is biased.

23 Feb 2015

The petitioners, pre-nationalisation tenants of premises belonging to Dena Bank, challenged eviction proceedings initiated against them under the Publ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Municipal Corporation's Demolition Notice for Alleged Unauthorized Structure — Petitioner's Brother as Society Member Not Liable for Unauthorized Construction Without Personal Notice. Notice under Section 351 of Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, quashed as petitioner was not owner or occupier of the flat.

21 Sep 2005

The petitioner, Milind Dattatreya Sugavkar, a practicing advocate, filed a writ petition challenging a notice issued by the Municipal Corporation of G...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Writ Petition Challenging Refusal to Issue Certificate of Purchase Under Bombay Tenancy Act. The Court held that the tenant's right to purchase land under Section 32G of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 is not barred by limitation despite delay in issuance of certificate, and the Mamlatdar's order was perverse.

4 May 2011

The petitioner, Mesaji S/o Laxman Ubare, was a tenant of agricultural land owned by the respondents. He claimed to have become a deemed purchaser of t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Municipal Employees' Petitions for Pensionary Benefits — Held That Pension Is Not a Bounty but a Right, and Denial Without Proper Notice or Opportunity Violates Natural Justice. The court directed the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai to consider representations of retired employees for pension and pass reasoned orders after hearing them.

17 Mar 2018

The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by retired employees of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) seeking pensionary benefits...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)