Search Results for "Trust objects"

916 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 916 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Will Construction Case — No Substantial Question of Law Found. Interpretation of Will and Codicil Held to Be a Question of Fact, Not Law, Under Section 100 CPC.

The case involves a dispute over the interpretation of a Will and Codicil executed by one Jehangir Bomanji Boman Behram (the testator), a wealthy soli...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Will Construction Case — No Substantial Question of Law Found. Interpretation of Will and Codicil Held to Be a Question of Fact, Not Law, Under Section 100 CPC.

The case involves a First Appeal registered as such but to be decided as a Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Refusal of Permission for Sale of Trust Property Under Section 36 of Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950. The Court Held That the Charity Commissioner's Refusal Was Justified as the Trust Failed to Show Urgent Necessity or Benefit to the Trust.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions challenging a common order dated 19.4.2005 passed by the Charity Commissioner, Pune, refusing permission unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Exemption Under Section 11 for Trust After Trust Deed Amendment Removes Dominant Control. Court Finds Predominant Object Charitable Despite Initial Rejection Based on Earlier Assessment Years.

The appeal arose from the refusal of the Income Tax Department to grant exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to the respondent trust...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Family Arrangement Dispute Involving Public Trust. Clause 16 of MOU directing change in trust management held valid and enforceable under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioners, Shri Mahavir Prasad Mansinghka and another, challenged an arbitral award dated 25th November, 2002 under Section 34 of the Arbitratio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Declaration of Trusteeship in Breach Candy Swimming Bath Trust Dispute. Court holds that plaintiffs failed to prove valid appointment as trustees and that the suit was barred by limitation and lacked cause of action.

The plaintiffs, nine individuals, filed a suit in the Bombay High Court seeking a declaration that they are trustees of the Breach Candy Swimming Bath...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Considers Appeal Against Admission of Coffee Day Enterprises to CIRP Under Section 7 of Insolvency Code. Appeal Raises Questions on the Validity of Debenture Trustee's Action and Limitation Period Based on Debenture Trust Deed Provisions.

The appeal arose from an order of the NCLT Bengaluru Bench admitting Coffee Day Enterprises Limited (the corporate debtor) into Corporate Insolvency R...