Search Results for "Trade union recognition"

634 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 634 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MCGM Petition Against Union Recognition in Industrial Dispute. Court upholds Industrial Court's finding that petitioner failed to prove loss of majority support by respondent union under Section 22 of Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946.

The petitioner, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Reference Under Section 10(1) of Industrial Disputes Act at Instance of Unrecognized Union. Contract Labour Workmen Can Raise Industrial Dispute Through Any Union, Recognized or Not, Under Section 10(1) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioner, Bharat Forge Limited, a company engaged in manufacturing forgings, challenged the validity of a reference made by the Additional Commi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Management's Appeal in Labour Dispute Over Recognition of Protected Workmen. Single Judge's Order Set Aside as Management Has Discretion Under Section 33 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The case involves a writ appeal filed by the Management, M/s. Fouress Engineering (India) Ltd., challenging an order of a Single Judge of the High Cou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Employer's Failure to Implement Award and Settlement Constitutes Unfair Labour Practice Under Item 9 Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act.

The petitioner, Tata Yazaki Autocomp Ltd., a company manufacturing wire harness for the automobile sector employing around 500 permanent workmen in Pu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Workman to Be Represented by Trade Union Office Bearer in Domestic Inquiry — Vice-President of Union Held Entitled to Represent Member Under Section 22(2)(c) of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. Statutory Right Cannot Be Restricted by Union Constitution.

The petitioner, Dastgir Alam Mulla, a plant-operator employed by Mysore Petrochemicals Limited since 1992, was suspended on 29-11-2004 and a chargeshe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Petition in Industrial Dispute — No Employer-Employee Relationship Established. Complaint under MRTU & PULP Act fails as workers were employees of contractor, not principal company.

The Engineering Workers' Union filed a complaint under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Petition Alleging Unfair Labour Practice by Employer. Company's denial of permanency to 15 workmen held not to constitute unfair labour practice under Item 6 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 as workmen failed to prove continuous service.

The petitioner, Maharashtra Association of General Workers, a trade union, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order dated November 20,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Petition Alleging Unfair Labour Practice in Promotion of Workmen. Industrial Court's finding that promotions were based on merit and seniority as per settlement upheld.

The petitioner, Dockyard Labour Union, a trade union registered under the Trade Unions Act, 1926, filed a complaint before the Industrial Court at Mum...