Search Results for "Taluk Panchayath"

181 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 181 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State Appeals in Land Acquisition Case — Upholds Compensation Enhancement for Acquired Land. Court holds that belated acquisition proceedings and failure to pay compensation within five years render acquisition lapsed under Section 11A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case involves a batch of writ appeals filed by the State of Karnataka and its authorities against the judgment of a learned Single Judge in land a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Removal of Encroachments on National Highway Due to Alternative Remedy — Petitioner Directed to Approach Civil Court for Disputed Title and Possession Issues Under Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The petitioner, Mohammed Beevi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the responde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Panchayat Orders in Land Dispute Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Orders passed without notice to petitioner set aside, matter remitted for fresh hearing under Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993.

The petitioner, Sri Manje Gowda, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Trial Court Order Refusing to Implead Trust Members in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Held That Necessary Parties Must Be Joined Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC to Avoid Multiplicity of Proceedings.

The petitioners, who are trustees and office bearers of Shree Beereswara (Channakeshwara) Swamy Seva Trust, filed a writ petition challenging the orde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Inconsistencies in Prosecution Case. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Rangappa, was convicted by the III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kolar (sitting at K.G.F.) in S.C.No.122/2015 for the murder ...