High Court of Karnataka Quashes Panchayat Orders in Land Dispute Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Orders passed without notice to petitioner set aside, matter remitted for fresh hearing under Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Sri Manje Gowda, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, seeking to quash two orders: (1) an order dated 16.1.2014 passed by the President, Zilla Panchayat, Mandya District in Appeal No.7/2002-03 (Annexure-A), and (2) an order dated 7.3.2002 passed by the President, Taluk Panchayat, Nagamangala Taluk in proceedings No. C5 vÁ¥ÀA.¥Àæ.¹Dgï.:83:2001-02 (Annexure-L). The dispute pertained to a land matter involving the petitioner and respondent No.5, Sri Shive Gowda. The petitioner contended that the impugned orders were passed without issuing any notice to him and without affording him an opportunity of being heard, thereby violating the principles of natural justice. The respondents, including the State of Karnataka and the panchayat authorities, were represented by counsel. The court, after hearing the parties, found that the orders were indeed passed in violation of natural justice as no notice was given to the petitioner. Consequently, the court quashed both impugned orders and remitted the matter back to the President of the Zilla Panchayat, Mandya District, with a direction to pass fresh orders after issuing notice to the petitioner and respondent No.5 and affording them a reasonable opportunity of hearing. The court also directed that the matter be disposed of within three months from the date of receipt of the order. The writ petition was allowed in those terms.

Headnote

A) Panchayat Raj - Natural Justice - Right to be Heard - Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 - Sections 209, 210 - The petitioner challenged orders passed by the President of Zilla Panchayat and Taluk Panchayat relating to a land dispute without issuing notice to him or affording an opportunity of hearing. The Court held that the orders were passed in violation of principles of natural justice and quashed them, directing the authorities to pass fresh orders after hearing the petitioner. (Paras 1-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the impugned orders passed by the President of Zilla Panchayat and Taluk Panchayat are liable to be quashed on the ground of violation of principles of natural justice?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is allowed. The impugned orders dated 16.1.2014 (Annexure-A) and 7.3.2002 (Annexure-L) are quashed. The matter is remitted to the President of Zilla Panchayat, Mandya District to pass fresh orders after issuing notice to the petitioner and respondent No.5 and affording them a reasonable opportunity of hearing. The matter shall be disposed of within three months from the date of receipt of the order.

Law Points

  • Principles of natural justice
  • Right to be heard
  • Quasi-judicial orders
  • Violation of natural justice renders order void
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (KAR) (02) 30

Writ Petition No. 50646 of 2016 (LB-RES)

2023-02-27

Suraj Govindaraj

G S Venkat Subbarao for petitioner, B J Somayaji for R1 to R4, Narendra D.V. Gowda for R5

Sri Manje Gowda

The State of Karnataka, The President Zilla Panchayat, The President Taluk Panchayat, The Secretary Kondanahalli Grama Panchayat, Sri Shive Gowda

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging orders of panchayat authorities in a land dispute.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of orders dated 16.1.2014 and 7.3.2002 passed by the President of Zilla Panchayat and Taluk Panchayat respectively.

Filing Reason

Orders were passed without notice and without affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

Previous Decisions

Orders dated 16.1.2014 (Appeal No.7/2002-03) and 7.3.2002 (C5/83/2001-02) were passed by the panchayat authorities.

Issues

Whether the impugned orders were passed in violation of principles of natural justice?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that no notice was issued and no opportunity of hearing was given before passing the impugned orders.

Ratio Decidendi

Orders passed without notice and without affording an opportunity of hearing are in violation of principles of natural justice and are liable to be quashed.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: a. Quashing the impugned order dtd 16.1.2014 passed by the President, Zilla Panchayat, Mandya District, Mandya in proceedings No. Jipanman Appeal No.7/2002-03 vide Annexure-A and consequently issue writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dtd 7.3.2002 C5 vÁ¥ÀA.¥Àæ.¹Dgï.:83:2001-02, passed by the President, Taluk Panchayat, Nagamangala Taluk, Nagamangala vide Annexure-L and etc.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition before the High Court of Karnataka challenging two orders passed by panchayat authorities. The court heard the matter and allowed the petition, quashing the orders and remitting the matter for fresh hearing.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
  • Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Panchayat Orders in Land Dispute Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Orders passed without notice to petitioner set aside, matter remitted for fresh hearing under Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Probate Application Under Section 276 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 — Non-Compliance with Court Directions Leads to Dismissal. Petitioners failed to produce original Will and...