Search Results for "Tahsildar Report"

874 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 874 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unnatural Conduct of Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 302 and 506 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Rahul Limbaji Thorat, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Vaijapur, for the murder of his wife Vandana under Sections 302 a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Acquisition Order for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Notice Requirements Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Failure to Serve Section 4(1) Notice and Conduct Section 5-A Inquiry Renders Acquisition Proceedings Invalid.

The petitioner, Yusuf Ali S/o Khader Shah Faqeer, is the legal heir of the original petitioner Khadarsha Faqeer. The original petitioner had filed W.P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of 50% Reservation for Women in Gram Panchayats — Rule 3(1)(c) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats (Reservation of Seats for Women) Rules, 1995 Held Intra Vires the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 and Article 243D of the Constitution.

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by Shri Tatyasaheb Ramchandra Kale against the judgment of a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50. Failure to Inform Accused of Right to be Searched Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate Renders Conviction Unsustainable.

The appellant, Gangaram s/o Jairam Chaudekar, was convicted under Section 20(b)(i) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch in Gram Panchayat Dispute. Court holds that the motion was validly passed by a majority of members and the petitioners failed to establish any procedural irregularity under the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act.

The case involves a dispute regarding a no-confidence motion passed against the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Kasbe Sukene, Taluka Niphad, District Nashi...