Search Results for "Sole Beneficiary"

380 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 380 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Probate of Will in Favor of Propounder Despite Allegations of Undue Influence. Court holds that propounder discharged burden of proving due execution and testamentary capacity under Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

The plaintiff, Janki Suresh Bhandoola, as the sole executrix named in the last will and testament of Sushiladevi T. Parsani (the testatrix), filed a s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Probate of Will in Testamentary Suit — Execution and Attestation Proved Despite Suspicious Circumstances. Handwriting Expert and Attesting Witness Evidence Accepted to Establish Validity of Will Under Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925.

The suit was filed by Vibhushit Trivedi, the sole surviving executor, seeking probate of the last Will and testament of Chhotalal Karunashankar Trived...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Sole Executrix in Probate Petition Under Indian Succession Act Over Will's Validity. Failure to Prove Execution Under Section 68 of Evidence Act and Suspicious Circumstances Found Including Testator's Ill Health and Exclusion of Sons.

The litigation originated from an application for probate of an alleged will executed by Edakuda Panankandiyil Narayana Kurup, who passed away on 4 Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Will in Testamentary Suit — Dismisses Caveat by Other Heirs. Will dated 3rd December 1988 executed by deceased Hiroo @ Hiraji Laxman Jadhav proved as last Will and Testament; letter of administration granted to plaintiffs.

The case involves a testamentary dispute concerning the Will of Hiroo @ Hiraji Laxman Jadhav, who died on 3rd December 1988. The plaintiffs, Subhash H...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Daughter's Partition Appeal Against Brother and Mother, Holding Father's Properties as Self-Acquired and Not Ancestral. Daughter Entitled to Equal Share Under Section 8 of Hindu Succession Act, 1956 as Will Not Proved.

The appellant, M. Shobha, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment and decree date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Trust Dispute — Interpretation of Indenture of Trust dated 29th March 1949. Court holds that the Appellant/Plaintiff failed to establish any right, title or interest in the trust property under the Deed of Trust.

The dispute pertains to an Indenture of Trust executed on 31st March 1949 between Parvatibai Chowhan (Settler) and Rai Bahadur Kunwar Motisingh Lalsin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Probate Petition for Will Dated 1988 Due to Suspicious Circumstances and Failure to Prove Genuine Execution. Court holds that propounder must dispel all suspicions surrounding the will, including unnatural disposition and lack of independent evidence.

The case concerns a testamentary suit filed by Suresh Hemmady, the executor under the will of Mira R. Nadkarni, seeking probate of the will dated 15th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses First Wife's Appeal for Family Pension Due to Settlement Deed and Nomination in Favor of Second Wife. Family Pension Entitlement Under Sikkim Services (Pension) Rules, 1990 Is Conditional on Nomination, Not Automatic for Multiple Wives.

The appellants, the first wife and her two children of the deceased Ram Chandra Nirola, challenged the denial of a succession certificate and family p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Land Owner's Appeal in Consumer Case, Holding No Joint Liability for Developer's Default. Collaboration Agreement and Tripartite Agreement Did Not Impose Obligation on Land Owner to Flat Buyers Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The appeals arose from a common judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) allowing a complaint by flat buyers against a ...