Search Results for "Software Purchase"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Software Purchase"

69 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 69 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Part on Operational Creditor Status but Upholds Dismissal on Limitation in Insolvency Case. The court held that a purchaser does not qualify as an operational creditor under Section 5(20) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and the application under Section 9 was barred by limitation due to debt arising from 2013 transactions.

4 Feb 2022

The appeal arose from a dispute under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, involving the appellant, Consolidated Construction Consortium Limited,...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Service Tax Case on Design Services. Engineering Design & Drawings Imported for Manufacturing Wind Turbine Generators Held Taxable as 'Design Services' Under Finance Act, 1994.

10 Apr 2023

The case involves an appeal by the Revenue against the CESTAT order which held that 'Engineering Design & Drawings' imported by M/s Suzlon Energy Limi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition to Quash FIR in Volkswagen Cheat Device Case — Investigation Not Impeded by Pending Civil Appeals Before NGT. Delay and Disputed Facts Cannot Be Grounds for Quashing FIR Under Section 482 CrPC.

26 Nov 2020

The petitioner, Skoda Auto Volkswagen India Private Limited, a company engaged in the manufacture and sale of passenger vehicles, was aggrieved by the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Challenge to Settlement Commission Order in Bogus Purchases Case — No Jurisdictional Error Found. Settlement Commission's Discretion to Accept Additional Income Disclosure Under Section 245D of Income Tax Act, 1961 Upheld as Not Perverse or Unreasonable.

13 Jun 2013

The Revenue (Commissioner of Income Tax, Pune) filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order dated 21 September 201...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Telecom Dispute Over Quantum Meruit Claim Under Section 70 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 — Contractual Relationship Bars Quantum Meruit Recovery. The Court held that where parties are governed by an express contract, a claim under Section 70 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 is not permissible, as the section applies only in the absence of a contractual relationship.

27 Feb 2019

The appeal arose from a dispute under the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997, between Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. (appellant) and Tata...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Acquits Appellants in Counterfeit Currency Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Procedural Lapses. Conviction under Section 489B r/w 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove possession or use of counterfeit currency notes.

25 Nov 2010

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of Prabhakar Patlola and Venkatesh Chanda under Section 489B read with Section 34 of the Indian Pen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in MVAT Classification Dispute — Multi Function Printers Held Classifiable as Automatic Data Processing Machines Under Entry 84.71. The Court ruled that multi function printers with copying, printing, scanning, and faxing capabilities are classifiable as automatic data processing machines or units thereof under Entry 84.71 of the VAT Notification, not as laser jet printers or under residual entry.

20 Dec 2018

The appellant, Ricoh India Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, filed an appeal under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 200...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award Due to Limitation Bar. Delay of 85 Days in Filing Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act Not Condoned for Lack of Sufficient Cause.

7 Apr 2026

The present appeal was filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 read with Section 13(1-A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 20...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Appoints Sole Arbitrator in Share Subscription Dispute Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court holds that existence of arbitration clause in Share Subscription Agreement and Shareholders Agreement warrants appointment of arbitrator despite objections regarding non-signatory parties and limitation.

11 Aug 2022

The petitioner, Minions Ventures Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Telecom Tower Installation in Residential Area Under Section 419 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 — Municipal Corporation Cannot Refuse Permission Based on Unauthorized Policy Restricting Towers in Residential Zones. Held that the power to grant permission under Section 419 is quasi-judicial and must be exercised reasonably, and a blanket ban on telecom towers in residential areas is ultra vires the Act.

26 Sep 2017

The petitioner, Bharti Airtel Limited, a telecom service provider, sought permission from the Mira Bhayandar Municipal Corporation to install a teleco...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)