Search Results for "Serious Fraud Investigation Office"

419 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 419 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Rehears Quashing Petition Against Lokayukta FIR for Disproportionate Assets After Supreme Court Remand; Petitioner Alleges Absence of Preliminary Enquiry and Non-Application of Mind by Superintendent of Police Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The petitioner, a Superintendent Engineer in the Public Works Department, Government of Karnataka, filed a writ petition under Article 226 read with S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Appeals Against Company Law Board's Investigation Order Under Section 237(b)(i) of Companies Act, 1956. Appeals challenge the order directing investigation into the affairs of companies allegedly linked to Ketan Parekh in the 2001 stock scam.

The judgment pertains to 14 appeals filed by various companies alleged to be controlled by Ketan Parekh, the central figure in the 2001 stock market s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Official Liquidator's Plea for Handover of Assets and Records of Companies in Liquidation. Law Enforcement Agencies' Seizure of Properties and Books of Account Examined in Context of Winding Up Proceedings Under Companies Act, 1956.

The proceedings involved multiple Official Liquidator’s Reports and a Company Application arising out of the winding up of M/s. City Limouzines (Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Quashing Petition in SFIO Case — Remand Orders Valid Despite Cognizance Issue. Court holds that remand orders under Section 167 Cr.P.C. are independent of cognizance and not subject to challenge under Section 482 Cr.P.C. after filing of complaint.

The applicant, Hari Sankaran, was arrested by the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) on 1 April 2019 for an offence punishable under Section 44...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Film Promotion Case for Misuse of Police Commissioner's Name and Emblem. The court held that the advertisement was a promotional gimmick and did not constitute cheating, forgery, or any offence under the Information Technology Act.

The applicants, Sanjay Gupta (a film director and producer) and a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, were named as accused in FIR No....