Search Results for "Section 75(5)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Section 75(5)"

247 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 247 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Government Contract Dispute Despite Non-Exhaustion of Pre-Arbitration Procedure. Party Autonomy and Minimal Judicial Intervention Upheld Under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

28 Nov 2025

The appellant, Hindustan Construction Company Ltd., was awarded a contract by the respondent, Bihar Rajya Pul Nirman Nigam Ltd. (BRPNNL), on 04.03.201...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in MSME Contract Dispute with Railways — Waiver of Section 12(5) Ineligibility Upheld. Petitioner's claim for additional wages dismissed as arbitrator's findings on facts and law were not patently illegal or against public policy.

11 Nov 2024

The petitioner, M/s. Truly Pest Solution Private Limited, a Micro, Small and Medium Enterprise (MSME), was awarded a contract by the Central Railway f...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Condition No. 5 of NOCs for Redevelopment Projects — Condition Imposing Payment of Expenditure Incurred by Board Held Unauthorized and Without Legal Basis. Court directs refund of amounts paid under protest pursuant to the impugned condition.

23 Nov 2022

The Petitioner, Chandulal Jorawarmal Mehta, a sole proprietor of Mehta Developers, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court Order Refusing Termination of Arbitral Tribunal Mandate. Appellant Failed to Demonstrate Bias or Justifiable Doubts Under Section 14 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

4 Jan 2022

The appellant, a supplier of paper, entered into a contract with the respondent in 1993. Disputes arose regarding payment and quality of supply. The a...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in SAFEMA Forfeiture Case — Notice to Convict Not Mandatory When Property Held by Relatives. The Court held that proceedings against relatives under Section 6 of SAFEMA are independent and do not require prior notice to the convict.

14 Dec 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals against a Madras High Court judgment that had set aside forfeiture orders under the Smugglers and Foreign Exc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Clarification in Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 — Circular No.21/2020 Held Ultra Vires. The clarification requiring withdrawal of appeal as a condition for filing declaration under the Act was struck down as arbitrary and violative of Article 14.

25 Mar 2021

The petitioner, Macrotech Developers Limited, a public limited company engaged in real estate, filed a writ petition under Article 226 challenging a c...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Affirms Interim Maintenance for Wife and Son in Matrimonial Dispute. Court Frames Guidelines on Maintenance Under Section 125 Cr.P.C. and Other Enactments to Ensure Uniformity and Consistency.

4 Nov 2020

The case arises from an application for interim maintenance filed by the wife and minor son under Section 125 Cr.P.C. The wife left the matrimonial ho...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Stays Its Own Judgment in Birla Institute of Technology Case Due to Non-Consideration of Retrospective Amendment to Payment of Gratuity Act. The Court found a prima facie error in its earlier judgment allowing the appeal because the retrospective amendment to Section 2(e) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 was not brought to its notice.

9 Jan 2019

The Supreme Court, on 09.01.2019, suo motu listed Civil Appeal No.2530 of 2012 (Birla Institute of Technology v. State of Jharkhand & Ors.) to reconsi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Restoration of Land Acquisition Reference Dismissed for Default — Principles of Natural Justice Violated. Court sets aside dismissal order and restores L.A.R. No. 550 of 2000, holding that the Reference Court erred in dismissing the reference without giving the claimant an opportunity to lead evidence.

9 Sep 2011

The revision applicant, Subhash Babulal Rajput, owned 1 Hector 20 Ares of land in Gat No. 27, village Gandheshwar, Taluka Khultabad, District Aurangab...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused No.3 in Photo Lab Murder and Robbery Case — Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen Theory and Recovery of Stolen Articles Sufficient to Prove Guilt. The court held that the chain of circumstances was complete and pointed only to the guilt of the accused under Sections 302, 397, 120-B read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

23 Aug 2006

The case pertains to the conviction of Rajkumar Bhawanidin Dube (Appellant No.1, Accused No.3) and another accused (since deceased) for the murder of ...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)