Search Results for "Section 50A"

48 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 48 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Appeal by DGCA Against Order Directing Reconsideration of Aircraft Registration Cancellation. Single Judge's Direction to Reconsider Without Prejudging Maintained as No Final Determination of Rights.

The case involves a dispute regarding the cancellation of registration of an aircraft owned by the private respondents. The Director General of Civil ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Charity Commissioner's Order Allowing Intervention in Trust's Section 36 Application. Right to be Heard Under Maharashtra Public Trust Act, 1951 Limited to Persons with Direct Interest in Trust Property.

The petitioner, Shree Khambhati Modh Vanik Samaj, is a public charitable trust registered under the Maharashtra Public Trust Act, 1950. It owns a prop...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Remand Order by Appellate Authority Under Payment of Gratuity Act. Section 7(8) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Does Not Confer Power to Remand; Appellate Authority Must Decide Appeal on Merits.

The petitioner, Dr. Gajanan Vithoba Jain, a former employee of the respondent-management running Shiv Vaibhav College of Education, Wardha, filed an a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Letters Patent Appeal by Purchaser of Tenanted Agricultural Land Against Order Setting Aside Mutation Entry. Mutation Entries Do Not Confer Title and Purchaser Cannot Claim Rights Without Adjudication Under Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

The appellant, M/s. S. Kumar Developers and Builders, purchased agricultural land that was tenanted. The appellant obtained mutation entries in the re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Will Construction Case — No Substantial Question of Law Found. Interpretation of Will and Codicil Held to Be a Question of Fact, Not Law, Under Section 100 CPC.

The case involves a dispute over the interpretation of a Will and Codicil executed by one Jehangir Bomanji Boman Behram (the testator), a wealthy soli...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Will Construction Case — No Substantial Question of Law Found. Interpretation of Will and Codicil Held to Be a Question of Fact, Not Law, Under Section 100 CPC.

The case involves a First Appeal registered as such but to be decided as a Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Commissioner of Labour's Order Holding Religious Trust as Commercial Establishment Under Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948. Trust's Charitable and Religious Objects Exclude It from Definition of Commercial Establishment Under Section 2(4) of the Act.

The petitioner, Shri Vatavriksha Swami Maharaj Devasthan, Akkalkot, is a religious and charitable trust registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act o...