Search Results for "Section 446 Companies Act"

93 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 93 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Appeal in Revenue Recovery Dispute Against Company in Liquidation. Priority of secured creditor's claim under Section 529A of Companies Act, 1956 upheld over State's statutory dues under Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964.

The case involves an appeal by the State of Karnataka and its officers against an order of the Company Judge dated 03.11.1998 in Company Application N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Insolvency Petition Against Debtor for Non-Compliance with Notice of Motion Requirement Under Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909 — Petition Filed Within Three Months of Act of Insolvency but Notice of Motion Not Disposed of Before Petition Filing.

The Petitioning Creditor, M/s Sanskar Gem Pvt. Ltd., filed an insolvency petition under the Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909, seeking an order of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Condonation of Delay in Filing Revised E-Form INC-28 for Voluntary Dissolution. Court Permits Correction of Company Status from 'Under Liquidation' to 'Dissolved' Under Sections 637B, 446(2), 481 of Companies Act, 1956.

The applicant, M/s. Plyworth Marketing India Pvt. Ltd. (under liquidation), filed Company Application No.32/2019 in O.L.R. No.9/2017 before the High C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Possession Claim by Lessee in Company Liquidation — Official Liquidator Directed to Hand Over Property Subject to Lease. Leasehold Rights Survive Winding Up and Official Liquidator Must Respect Lessee's Right to Possession Under Section 456 of Companies Act, 1956.

The Provident Investment Company Ltd., a Government of Madhya Pradesh undertaking, filed an application seeking possession of leasehold land admeasuri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Debenture Trustee's Claim for Payment from Suit Amount Held by Court Receiver in Priority Over Assignee of Decree. The court held that an assignee of a decree steps into the shoes of the assignor and cannot claim priority over the original decree holder who is a debenture trustee.

The dispute arose from a suit filed by ICICI Bank Ltd. (plaintiff) as debenture trustee for holders of 15% non-convertible debentures issued by Pal Pe...