Search Results for "Section 34(1)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Section 34(1)"

968 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 968 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Secured Creditors in SARFAESI Act Case — Holds Chief Judicial Magistrate Competent Under Section 14. The Court resolved the conflict among High Courts by interpreting that the CJM can exercise powers under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, for taking possession of secured assets in non-metropolitan areas.

23 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court resolved a conflict among High Courts regarding the interpretation of Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Trade Circulars Restricting CST Exemption to Registered Dealers. State Government Cannot Grant Exemption for Inter-State Sales to Unregistered Dealers Under Section 8(5) of Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 After 2002 Amendment.

30 Aug 2012

The petitioners, Prism Cement Limited and its shareholder/director, filed a writ petition challenging three trade circulars issued by the Commissioner...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Writ Petition (PIL) – Cause Title Only. No substantive judgment text provided.

21 Jun 2016

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Petitions Challenging Constitutional Validity of Forest Development Tax Notification. Petitioners Alleged Notification Ultra Vires Article 246 and Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, Seeking to Quash Demand Notices.

3 Dec 2015

A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka by various mining companies, corporations, and individuals, including National ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal in SARFAESI Act Auction Forfeiture Case — Earnest Money Deposit Forfeiture Upheld as Compensation for Breach of Contract. The Court held that forfeiture of earnest money deposit by a secured creditor under the SARFAESI Act is not subject to proof of actual loss and is governed by the terms of the auction contract, not Sections 73 and 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.

10 Aug 2022

The case involves two appeals by a nationalized bank (appellant) against a common judgment of the Madras High Court, which had allowed the writ petiti...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Whether Land Acquisition Act Permits Acquisition of Building Part Without Underlying Land; State's Appeal Against High Court Quashing of Acquisition Without Land Under Consideration

31 Jul 2026

The State of Maharashtra appealed against a common judgment of the High Court which quashed land acquisition proceedings initiated under the Land Acqu...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Notification Dated 16.08.2008 Imposing Forest Development Tax. Validity of Notification Questioned on Grounds of Legislative Competence and Consistency with Central Forest Laws.

3 Dec 2015

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Minister's Order Setting Aside Disqualification of Director in Cooperative Bank. Disqualification under Section 73EA(ii) of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 is automatic and Registrar's order under Section 78(1) is ministerial; appellate authority must apply mind.

16 Aug 2012

The dispute in this writ petition relates to the disqualification of respondent No.4, Prafulla s/o Khushalrao Mankar, as a Director of the Yavatmal Di...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Denial of Private Security Agency Licence Under Section 6(1)(b) of Private Security Agencies (Regulation) Act, 2005 — Conviction for Offence with Prescribed Punishment of Less Than Two Years Does Not Attract Disqualification. The court held that the phrase 'prescribed punishment' in Section 6(1)(b) refers to the maximum punishment prescribed for the offence, and since the maximum punishment under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is two years (less than two years), such conviction does not disqualify the applicant.

11 Mar 2020

The petitioners, M/s Chase Security Services and its proprietor Ravindra Prabhakar Sawant, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution...

High Court

Bombay High Court Admitted Second Appeal on Questions of Law Concerning Insolvency Act and Auction Sale Confirmation. The Court Framed Eight Substantial Questions Involving Interpretation of Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920, Order 21 Rule 92 CPC, and Res Judicata in Tenancy Proceedings.

10 Jun 2013

The matter concerned a long-standing insolvency dispute dating back to 1959. Roopsingh Chainsingh Ture filed Insolvency Application No.12 of 1959 befo...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)