Search Results for "Section 264 revision"

208 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 208 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Section 28A(1) of Maharashtra Civil Courts Act, 1869 in Probate Reference. Section 28A(1) is not inconsistent with Indian Succession Act, 1925, and Civil Judges can be invested with probate jurisdiction.

This judgment arises from a reference under Section 113 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, made by the learned Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision in NI Act Case, Restores Conviction Despite Change of Magistrate. Section 143 of Negotiable Instruments Act Overrides Section 326(3) CrPC, Succeeding Magistrate Can Proceed on Evidence Recorded by Predecessor.

The petitioner, Shivaji Sampat Jagtap, filed a Criminal Revision Application against the judgment of the Sessions Court which had set aside his convic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Civil Revision Application Against Land Acquisition Officer's Refusal to Refer Enhancement Compensation Claim. Case Raises Issue Whether Officer Can Reject Reference Under Section 34(1) of Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961 When Agreement for Negotiated Price Exists.

The case arose from the acquisition of land Gut No. 26, admeasuring 2 H. 10 R, situated at Village Ladgaon, Aurangabad, belonging to the original owne...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision in Summary Criminal Case Under Section 138 NI Act — Trial Must Be De Novo After Transfer Under Section 326 CrPC. The Court held that in summary trials, the successor Magistrate cannot act on evidence recorded by predecessor and must conduct de novo trial.

The applicant, Jaikishan Kanjiwani, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the respondent, M/s Kumar Matc...