Search Results for "Section 25F compliance"

167 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 167 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Employer Challenging Labour Court Order Holding Termination of Trainees as Unfair Labour Practice. Trainees performing regular work for over 240 days deemed permanent workmen under Model Standing Orders, termination without Section 25F compliance illegal.

The petitioners, M/s Mukand Limited and others, challenged an order of the Labour Court at Thane and the revisional order of the Industrial Court at T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Reinstatement of Employee in Industrial Dispute for Non-Compliance of Section 25F and 25G of Industrial Disputes Act. Labour Court's order of reinstatement with continuity of service confirmed, but backwages stayed pending compliance with retrenchment procedure.

The Municipal Corporation, Akola, challenged the Labour Court's order in Reference IDA No. 10 of 2005, which held that the termination of the responde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Challenge to Labour Court Awards in Industrial Dispute Cases. Court upholds reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages for workmen whose services were terminated without compliance with Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The judgment pertains to three writ petitions filed by Pimpri-Chinchwad Mahanagarpalika (Municipal Corporation) challenging separate awards passed by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal of Workman Challenging Termination as Contractual Appointment Not Covered Under Industrial Disputes Act. Workman Appointed on Contract Basis for Specific Project Not Entitled to Protection Under Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The appellant, D.N. Shivaraj, was appointed as a Work Inspector on 06.08.1990 by the Belgaum Urban Development Authority (respondent No.1) and the Gov...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Zilla Parishad in Labour Dispute — Reinstatement with Back Wages Set Aside Due to Lack of Evidence of Continuous Service. Workman Failed to Prove 240 Days of Service in a Calendar Year Under Section 25-B of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The appellant, the Chief Executive Officer of Zilla Parishad, Latur, challenged the order of a learned Single Judge dated 22.11.2012 in Writ Petition ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Termination of Daily Wage Workers by Municipal Council. Held that termination without notice and without following Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is illegal and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by daily wage workers employed by the Municipal Council, Bhusawal. The petitioners were engaged ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Reinstatement and Regularization of Retrenched Casual Workers in Food Corporation of India — Retrenchment Void Under Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Back wages restricted to 75% due to long gap in service.

The case involves an industrial dispute raised by the Executive Staff Union of Food Corporation of India on behalf of 21 casual workers who were retre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEDCL Petitions Challenging Labour Court Awards in Retrenchment Compensation Cases. Employer's Failure to Pay Full Wages and Notice Pay Under Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Renders Retrenchment Invalid.

The Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (MSEDCL) filed five writ petitions challenging separate awards of the Labour Court, Dhule,...