Search Results for "Section 210(3)"

38 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 38 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in NI Act Case, Sets Aside High Court Order for Exceeding Revision Jurisdiction. High Court Erred by Deciding Complaint on Merits Instead of Examining Legality of Remand Order Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The appeal arose from a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 filed by respondent No.1 (complainant) against the appella...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Trademark Opposition Case — Registration of Device Mark Set Aside Due to Lack of Evidence of Use. The Court held that the Registrar erred in accepting user claim without proper documentary evidence, and that the appellant's prior use since 1992 was established.

The appellant, Ganesh Consumer Products Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 91 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, against an order dated 11.09.2024 passed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeals in Motor Accident Claims — Upholds Compensation for Injured Claimants. Negligence of Driver Established, Insurer Liable to Pay Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case involves three appeals filed by Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. against separate awards of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bella...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim for Fracture and Dislocation of Hip. Claimant awarded additional Rs. 1,24,522/- for medical expenses, loss of income, pain and suffering, and future treatment.

The appellant, Ramdas Verlekar, filed a claim petition before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, South Goa, Margao, seeking compensation of Rs. 6,91,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Conviction of Appellants in Kidnapping for Ransom Case Under Section 364-A IPC — Life Sentence Confirmed Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Identification of Victim and Accused.

The case involves three appeals filed by Mohammad Imdar Ali (A-4), Srinivas Gauramkondu (A-2), and Suraj Kumar Jha (A-3) against their conviction and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Kidnapping for Ransom Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 364-A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand of ransom and identity of accused beyond reasonable doubt.

The judgment pertains to three criminal appeals filed by Mohammad Imdar Ali (A-4), Srinivas Gauramkondu (A-2), and Suraj Kumar Jha (A-3) challenging t...