Search Results for "Section 2(28)"

788 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 788 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows State's Revision Against Acquittal in Essential Commodities Act Case — Collector's Penalty Order Restored. Sessions Judge Exceeded Jurisdiction by Setting Aside Collector's Order Under Section 6A of Essential Commodities Act, 1955 Without Finding Illegality.

The State of Gujarat filed a criminal revision application against the order dated 07.03.2012 passed by the learned 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Nad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Notice Requirements Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Failure to Serve Valid Notice Within 15 Days of Dishonour Renders Complaint Not Maintainable.

The petitioner, Mohd. Jahir Mohd. Shikur, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition, Holds Labour Court is a 'Court' Under Section 195(1)(b) CrPC for Making Complaint of False Evidence. Labour Court's Rejection of Section 340 Application Set Aside as Labour Court Has Jurisdiction to Entertain Complaint for False Statement in Written Statement.

The writ petition challenged an order of the Labour Court rejecting an application under Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Awards Compensation for Illegal Detention in Murder Case Re-investigation. Petitioners' arrest after acquittal of accused held illegal under Article 21 of Constitution of India.

The petitioners, Surekha Dnyaneshwar Sonawane and Milind Govind Jadhav, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Easement Case — Right of Way Established by Prescription. Plaintiffs' claim for easement of necessity fails due to alternative access, but right of way by prescription under Section 15 of Easements Act, 1882 is upheld based on 20 years of uninterrupted user.

The case involves a dispute over a right of way between two branches of the same family. The plaintiffs, Laxman Sagun Vaigankar and Sitabai Sitaram Va...