Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Notice Requirements Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Failure to Serve Valid Notice Within 15 Days of Dishonour Renders Complaint Not Maintainable.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 141
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Mohd. Jahir Mohd. Shikur, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking quashing of FIR No. 1136 of 2018 registered at Jintur Police Station, District Parbhani, for offences under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The petitioner was the drawer of a cheque that was dishonoured. The respondents, including the State of Maharashtra and the complainant Ejjat Khan and others, opposed the petition. The core legal issue was whether the mandatory notice of dishonour under Section 138 proviso (b) was served within 15 days of the dishonour of the cheque. The petitioner argued that the notice was not served within the prescribed period, making the complaint not maintainable. The respondents contended that the notice was validly served. The court examined the dates: the cheque was dishonoured on 10th August 2017, and the notice was allegedly sent on 28th August 2017, which was beyond the 15-day period. The court held that the notice was not served within the mandatory period, and therefore the complaint under Section 138 was not maintainable. The court quashed the FIR and all consequential proceedings. The decision was in favour of the petitioner (accused).

Headnote

A) Negotiable Instruments Act - Dishonour of Cheque - Notice Requirement - Section 138 - Mandatory notice under proviso (b) must be served within 15 days of dishonour - Failure to serve valid notice within the prescribed period renders the complaint not maintainable - Held that the proceedings are liable to be quashed (Paras 5-8).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the FIR and criminal proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 can be quashed when the mandatory notice of dishonour was not served within the prescribed period of 15 days from the date of dishonour of cheque.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court quashed FIR No.1136 of 2018 registered at Jintur Police Station and all consequential proceedings therein.

Law Points

  • Notice under Section 138 NI Act must be served within 15 days of dishonour
  • Service of notice must be in accordance with Section 138 proviso (b)
  • Complaint under Section 138 NI Act must be filed within one month of cause of action
  • Quashing of FIR for non-compliance with mandatory requirements
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (12) 6

Criminal Writ Petition No.1136 of 2018

2019-12-17

Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi

Mr. S.K. Chavan for petitioner, Mr. R.J. Nirmal for respondent Nos.2 to 8, Mrs. P.V. Diggikar APP for respondent No.1-State

Mohd. Jahir Mohd. Shikur

The State of Maharashtra, Ejjat Khan, Billal Khan, Mansoor Ali Khan, Rahmat Khan, Ayub Khan, Aref Khan, Rajboddin Khan

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of FIR for offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of FIR No.1136 of 2018 registered at Jintur Police Station for offence under Section 138 of NI Act.

Filing Reason

Petitioner alleged that the mandatory notice of dishonour under Section 138 proviso (b) was not served within 15 days of dishonour of cheque, rendering the complaint not maintainable.

Issues

Whether the notice of dishonour under Section 138 of NI Act was served within the prescribed period of 15 days from the date of dishonour of cheque.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the cheque was dishonoured on 10th August 2017 and the notice was sent on 28th August 2017, beyond the 15-day period, making the complaint not maintainable. Respondents argued that the notice was validly served within the prescribed period.

Ratio Decidendi

The mandatory notice under Section 138 proviso (b) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 must be served within 15 days of the dishonour of the cheque. Failure to do so renders the complaint under Section 138 not maintainable, and the proceedings are liable to be quashed.

Judgment Excerpts

The notice was not served within the prescribed period of 15 days from the date of dishonour of the cheque. Therefore, the complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act is not maintainable.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking quashing of FIR No.1136 of 2018 registered at Jintur Police Station for offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 17th December 2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881: 138
  • Constitution of India: 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Amendment Introducing Multi-Member Wards and Multiple Votes in Municipal Elections — Amendment to Section 5 of BPMC Act and Section 10 of MMC Act Valid as Intra Vires the Constitution.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Notice Requirements Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Failure to Serve Valid Notice Within 15 Days of Dishonour Renders Complaint Not Mai...