Search Results for "Section 17(1)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...

Search Results for "Section 17(1)"

808 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 808 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Bank's Appeal Against Single Judge Order in Writ Petition Challenging Endorsement Under SARFAESI Act. Writ Petition Challenging Endorsement Under Section 13(2) of SARFAESI Act Held Not Maintainable Due to Alternative Remedy Under Section 17.

29 Nov 2024

The appellants, Union Bank of India and its Chief Manager, filed a writ appeal under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act against the order dated...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal by Union Bank of India in SARFAESI Act Matter — Endorsement Declining One-Time Settlement Not a 'Decision' Under Section 17(1) of SARFAESI Act, 2002. Writ Petition Challenging Bank's Endorsement Held Not Maintainable Due to Alternative Remedy Before DRT.

29 Nov 2024

The case involves a writ appeal filed by Union Bank of India (appellants) against an order dated 02.05.2023 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Ka...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Holds Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrators Violates Equality Principle Under Section 18 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Party Autonomy Cannot Override Mandatory Requirement of Independence and Impartiality, and Unilateral Appointment Clauses in Public-Private Contracts Are Unconscionable and Void.

13 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court of India, in a Constitution Bench judgment, addressed the validity of unilateral appointment of arbitrators under the Arbitration an...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Commercial Dispute Over Arbitral Award Set Aside by Commercial Court. Court Restores Arbitral Award Holding That the Commercial Court Exceeded Its Jurisdiction Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by Reappreciating Evidence.

29 Aug 2024

The case involves a commercial dispute between Navayuga Engineering Company (appellant) and Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Limited along with other ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in SARFAESI Auction Case, Reinstating DRT Order and Sale. High Court's Writ Jurisdiction Improper When Statutory Remedy Available; Auction Deposit Complied with Rules and Property Not Exempt as Agricultural Land Under Section 31(i) SARFAESI Act.

5 Jan 2023

The dispute arose from securitisation proceedings initiated by Indian Bank against M/s. Raus Constructions Private Ltd. after loan default. The bank c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes NAA Order Against McDonald's Franchisee in GST Anti-Profiteering Case — Failure to Consider Input Tax Credit Benefit and Lack of Proper Investigation. The court held that the National Anti-Profiteering Authority must consider the benefit of input tax credit and conduct a proper investigation before directing deposit of profiteered amount under Section 171 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

1 Oct 2019

The petitioner, Hardcastle Restaurants Pvt. Ltd., operates McDonald's restaurants in Western and Southern India. After the GST rate on restaurant serv...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru Adjudicates Lapsing of Land Acquisition for BDA Scheme; Examines Applicability of Section 24(2) of 2013 Act and Section 27 of BDA Act

27 Apr 2018

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru was seized of multiple writ petitions concerning land bearing Sy.No.103 of Nagarabhavi Village, measuring fou...

High Court

Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claims for Injured Victims and Dependents of Deceased — Applies Multiplier Method and Awards Future Prospects. The court upheld 50% contributory negligence by ST bus driver but recalculated loss of earning capacity and dependency using multiplier method with future prospects under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment arises from four first appeals filed by victims of a motor vehicle accident that occurred on 28th August 1999 involving an ST bus and a d...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 5 TADA for Possession of Weapon. Appellant Challenges Recovery Evidence and Disclosure Statement in Bombay Blast Case.

1 Jan 1970

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Disposes of Appeals in Mining Lease Dispute – Withdrawal of Recommendation and Reservation Notifications Challenged.

1 Jan 1970

These appeals arise from a common judgment of the Jharkhand High Court dated April 4, 2007, dismissing writ petitions filed by several companies engag...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)