Search Results for "Section 13(1)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Section 13(1)"

1508 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1508 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Examines Validity of Confiscation After Detention Under CGST Act. Goods Transported Without E-Way Bill and Alleged Undervaluation Leads to Dispute Over Proper Officer's Jurisdiction Under Sections 129 and 130 of CGST Act.

16 Aug 2022

This writ petition before the High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench concerned a challenge to an appellate order confirming the confiscation of goods a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Section 143-A of Negotiable Instruments Act Directory — Interim Compensation Requires Recording of Reasons. Court clarifies that Section 143-A is not mandatory and reasons must be recorded for quantum under Section 143-A(2).

7 Jul 2022

The judgment arises from two criminal writ petitions filed by Ashwin Ashokrao Karokar (accused) against Laxmikant Govind Joshi (complainant) under the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Assessee's Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Revision Application Under Section 264 of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Subsidy Held as Revenue Receipt, Not Capital. The Court ruled that acceptance of subsidy as taxable income in the returns and before the Settlement Commission precluded later challenge, and the settlement order was final and binding.

4 Feb 2019

The dispute arose from the petitioner, a public limited company engaged in textile manufacturing, having received interest reimbursement subsidies und...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Disqualifying Related Parties of Corporate Debtors from Submitting Resolution Plans. The Court holds that the disqualification under Section 29A(c) applies to persons acting jointly or in concert with a disqualified person, and that the provision is not retrospective in operation.

3 Oct 2024

The Supreme Court of India delivered a landmark judgment on the interpretation and validity of Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016...

High Court

Bombay High Court Division Bench Answers Referred Questions on Adequacy of Protection Under Section 52 of Transfer of Property Act and Grant of Interim Injunctions. The Court Examined Whether Section 52 TP Act Provides Sufficient Safeguard to Deny Injunction Pendente Lite and the Role of Notice Registration Under Section 18 of the Indian Registration Act.

4 Oct 2016

The appeal arose from an order of the Trial Court rejecting the appellant's application for temporary injunction in a suit for specific performance of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case for Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening of Assessment Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Invalid When Based on Same Material Already Considered in Original Assessment.

25 Aug 2023

The petitioner, Siemens Financial Services Pvt Ltd, a Non-Banking Finance Company registered with RBI, filed its return of income for Assessment Year ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Partial Rebate Under KVAT Act for Dealer Selling Both Taxable and Exempted Goods — Section 17 Read with Rule 131 Applicable Even When Exempted Goods Are Sold Under Section 5(3) Notification. The court held that the expression 'exempted goods under Section 5' in Section 17 includes goods exempted under a notification issued under Section 5(3) of the KVAT Act.

10 Aug 2016

The petitioner, M/s Jindal Aluminium Ltd., a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, filed multiple revision petitions under Section 65(1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice for Corporate Assessee in Income Tax Case — Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period and Without Valid Information. Reassessment under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 invalid as notice under Section 148A(b) was issued beyond three-year limitation period and based on information already considered in original assessment.

28 Feb 2024

The petitioner, Godrej Industries Ltd., challenged a show cause notice dated 24th May 2022 issued under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Civil Revision Application Challenging Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Trust Dispute Under Maharashtra Trust Act. Application Under Order VII Rule 11(d) of CPC Alleges Bar of Suit by Sections 22, 50, 51, 70 of Maharashtra Trust Act, 1950.

10 Jul 2019

The dispute centered on the expulsion of two trustees from a trust registered under the Maharashtra Trust Act, 1950. The applicants, comprising ten in...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition by Legal Heirs and Subsequent Purchaser Challenging District Registrar's Order Directing Registration of Sale Deed. Petitioners Contend Appeal Filed After Five Years Was Barred by Limitation and District Registrar Lacked Jurisdiction Under Section 72 of the Registration Act, 1908.

11 Feb 2026

The dispute centered on a sale deed dated 18.02.1988 that was presented for registration but refused by the Sub-Registrar for non-production of the in...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)