Search Results for "Retiral benefits"

505 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 505 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Employee's Challenge to Recovery of Excess Pension Paid Due to Mistaken Inclusion of Promotional Increment. Recovery of excess payment after six years of retirement held impermissible as per principles against recovery from retired employees.

The petitioner, Tarachand s/o Urkudaji Gajbhiye, a retired government employee, was aggrieved by an order dated 19.1.2016 issued by respondent No. 2, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Withdrawal of Voluntary Retirement Notice Before Intended Date in Service Matter - Rule 65 MCS (Pension) Rules, 1982 Does Not Bar Withdrawal. Senior Clerk's Withdrawal Request Made on Same Day Before Retirement Time Held Valid, Rejection Set Aside.

The petitioner, Vithal s/o Lingoji Kalyankar, was a Senior Clerk in the District Court at Nanded, having joined service on 06.06.1988. After about 30 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Invalid Caste Certificate Order for Retired Employee — Directs Release of Retiral Benefits. Employer Cannot Withhold Retiral Benefits for Non-Furnishing of Caste Validity Certificate After Superannuation.

The petitioner, Jayram Vishram Gangawane, was employed by the Food Corporation of India (FCI) as a Peon in 1976 in the open category. He was subsequen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Head Master's Petition for Pension and Benefits Despite Post-Retirement Disciplinary Inquiry. Disciplinary Inquiry Initiated After Superannuation Without Statutory Authority is Invalid and Pension Cannot Be Withheld.

The petitioner, Ashok Ramrao Kadam, was appointed as an Assistant Teacher on 9 August 1984 and later promoted as Head Master. He served until his supe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs State to Pay Provisional Pension to Retired Associate Professor in Writ Petition for Non-Payment of Pension. State directed to finalize pension papers within eight weeks and pay arrears with interest.

The petitioner, Kamlakar Dagdu Narkhade, retired as Associate Professor from K.N. Bhise Arts & Commerce College on 30 April 2010 after nearly two deca...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Employee's Challenge to Continuation of Departmental Enquiry; Rules No Provision to Continue Enquiry After Superannuation. Employee Entitled to Full Retiral Benefits as MAIDC Rules Do Not Permit Post-Retirement Disciplinary Proceedings.

The petitioner, a former Regional Manager of the Maharashtra Agro Industries Development Corporation Limited (MAIDC), filed a writ petition seeking to...