Search Results for "Resettlement Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "Resettlement Act"

434 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 434 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Samruddhi Mahamarg Highway Project — Petitioners' Challenge to Notification Under Section 3D(2) of National Highways Act, 1956 Fails as Court Finds No Violation of Principles of Natural Justice or Arbitrariness. The court held that the declaration under Section 3D(2) is a ministerial act following the hearing under Section 3C, and no further hearing is required.

24 Dec 2025

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by landowners challenging the acquisition of their lands for the Samruddhi Mahamarg (Mumbai-Nagp...

High Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appellant in Land Acquisition Compensation Case Under 2013 Act. Compensation Must Be Determined as per Market Value Under Indian Stamp Act, 1899 Without Applying Theory of Dediction from Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as per Section 26 of The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

27 Mar 2025

The dispute arose from the acquisition of land for widening and four-laning of National Highway No.12-A in Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, under The Right t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Refusal to Refer Dispute Under Section 64 of Land Acquisition Act. Competent Authority Directed to Refer Dispute Regarding Apportionment of Compensation to Arbitrator Under Section 51 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

7 Aug 2024

The petitioner, Gandharva Dhaneshwar Patil, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 29 January 2024 passed by the Deputy Collector (Rehabili...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Tamil Nadu Land Acquisition Acts in Challenge Based on Repugnancy to Central Act of 2013. Presidential Assent Under Article 254(2) Protects State Enactments from Being Void Despite Repugnancy to the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

9 May 2023

The case involves a challenge to the validity of three Tamil Nadu State Acts: the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Harijan Welfare Schemes Act, 1978...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Company's Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Awards for Irrigation Project — Title Not Established. Company failed to prove ownership of acquired lands, hence no locus standi to challenge awards under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

6 Jan 2023

The petitioner, Ugar Sugar Works Limited, a public limited company, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India chal...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Awards for Irrigation Project — Petitioner's Title Not Established as Owner of Acquired Lands. Petitioner claiming tenancy cannot challenge acquisition without established title.

6 Jan 2023

The petitioner, Ugar Sugar Works Limited, a public limited company, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India chal...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Land Owner's Consent Essential for Mode of Acquisition Under Section 126(1) MRTP Act — TDR Grant Requires Agreement, Not Unilateral Authority Action. The Court ruled that the option between monetary compensation and TDR under Section 126(1) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 is not solely with the acquiring authority but requires the consent of the land owner.

25 Jul 2022

This judgment arises from a reference made by a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court at Nagpur, which disagreed with the view taken in Asha Sunil Z...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Subsequent Purchaser in Land Acquisition Case — Purchase After Section 4 Notification Confers No Right to Challenge Acquisition or Invoke Section 24 of 2013 Act.

14 Oct 2019

The Supreme Court considered whether a purchaser of land after issuance of a notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 can invoke...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Land Acquisition for Pimpri-Chinchwad New Town Development Authority — Compensation Enhancement Granted. Landowners entitled to higher compensation under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for acquisitions under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

7 Aug 2019

The judgment involves three writ petitions filed by landowners and a developer challenging land acquisition proceedings initiated by the Pimpri-Chinch...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs State to Decide Representations of Forest Dwellers Under Forest Rights Act. Petitioners Sought Recognition of Forest Rights and Patta Under Sections 4(3), 4(5), 4(6) of Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006.

8 Feb 2016

The petitioners, twelve individuals claiming to be forest dwellers, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking directions to the State...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)