Search Results for "Railway Accident Compensation Rules 1990"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Railway Accident Compensation Rules 1990"

43 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 43 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Deemed Deceased a Bona Fide Passenger Based on Ticket Recovery and Circumstantial Evidence. The court held that the Railway Claims Tribunal erred in dismissing the claim for want of an eye witness, as the recovery of a valid journey ticket and police documents sufficiently proved the deceased was a bona fide passenger under Section 123(c) of the Railways Act, 1989.

7 Jun 2023

The appellant, Smt. Kamlabai Wd/o Mahadeorao Raut, mother of the deceased Kailash, filed a claim before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, seeking c...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim Case — Deceased Was a Bona Fide Passenger. The Tribunal erred in rejecting the claim on ground of lack of proof of bonafide passenger status despite availability of a valid ticket.

6 Jul 2018

The appellants, being the wife, son, and married daughter of the deceased Thippareddy, filed a claim before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Bangalore, un...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Injured Passenger Held to be Bona Fide Traveller. Fall from Train Due to Jerk Constitutes Untoward Incident Under Section 123(c)(2) of the Railways Act, 1989.

13 Mar 2024

The appellant, Satish Padole, filed a claim before the Railway Claims Tribunal for injuries sustained on 21 September 2018 at Pathrad Railway Station....

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Appeals for Enhancement of Compensation in Motor Vehicle Accident Deaths of Minors, Lays Down Guidelines for Just Compensation. Court Holds That Parents Are Entitled to Compensation Based on Notional Income of Deceased Minor Child, Applying Second Schedule Multipliers and Adding Future Prospects.

12 Sep 2024

The appeals arose from two motor vehicle accidents involving minor children. In MFA 11440/2011, a 14-year-old boy died when the motorcycle he was ridi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Shipping Corporation of India in Seaman's Compensation Claim — Holds That Myocardial Infarction Is Not an 'Accident' Under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923. The court ruled that a heart attack suffered by a seaman while on board ship does not constitute an 'accident' arising out of and in the course of employment under Section 3 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, as there was no causal connection between the nature of work and the injury.

18 Nov 2005

The respondent, a seaman registered with the Seamen's Association, had worked for 22 years on various ships including those of the appellant, Shipping...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Hears Appeal and Cross Objections in Motor Accident Claim. The case concerns enhancement of compensation awarded by MACT and the maintainability of cross objections under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

4 Dec 2020

The present matter arises from a fatal road accident on 25.07.2011, when Jose Leandro Souza, a 38-year-old welder and agricultural labourer, was struc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Driver Proved, No Contributory Negligence by Deceased. Deceased was a pillion rider on motorcycle hit by truck; court held that mere presence of pillion rider on motorcycle does not imply contributory negligence.

30 Nov -0001

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the appellants, who are the legal heirs of the deceased pillion rider. The deceased was riding as...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Awards Compensation to Victims of Meerut Fire Tragedy Due to State and Organizer Negligence. State and Organizers Held Jointly and Severally Liable for Deaths and Injuries from Fire at Victoria Park Exhibition Due to Failure to Obtain Permissions and Ensure Fire Safety.

12 Apr 2022

The Supreme Court dealt with a writ petition filed by victims of a fire tragedy that occurred on April 10, 2006, at Victoria Park, Meerut, during the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Employee's Petition and Dismisses Employer's Cross-Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Employee Denied SSRP Scheme but Granted Reinstatement Without Back Wages or Lumpsum Compensation. Reinstatement with continuity of service upheld but lumpsum compensation option set aside as not a valid alternative under Section 30 of MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

8 Aug 2013

The judgment involves two cross writ petitions arising from an order of the 7th Labour Court, Mumbai in Complaint (ULP) No.236 of 1994. The employee, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Parents' Claim for Compensation in Child's Death Due to Open Manhole - Municipal Corporation Held Liable for Negligence in Maintaining Drainage System. The court awarded Rs. 10 lakhs compensation for the death of a 5-year-old boy who fell into an uncovered manhole within the municipal limits.

11 Dec 2018

The petitioners, parents of a 5-year-old boy Tejas, filed a writ petition seeking compensation for his death due to the negligence of the Sangli Miraj...

2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)