Search Results for "Raichur"

239 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 239 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Plaintiff Failed to Prove Marriage and Consequential Rights Over Suit Property; Courts Below Correctly Appreciated Evidence.

The appellant, Basangouda, filed a suit for declaration and injunction in O.S. No. 20/2006 before the Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Dn.), Raichur, claim...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes FIR in SC/ST Act Case Due to Civil Dispute and Lack of Atrocity Elements. Allegations of Caste-Based Insults and Intimidation Found to be Vague and Motivated by Property Dispute, Not Attracting Sections 3(i), 3(iv), 3(xiii) of SC/ST Act.

The petitioners, a husband and wife, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR No. Spl(A) FI...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Evidence. Acquittal of Accused Under Sections 302 and 307 IPC Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The State of Karnataka filed an appeal under Section 378(1) and (3) Cr.P.C. against the judgment of acquittal dated 15.03.2012 passed by the Fast Trac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Application Under Order IX Rule 7 CPC Filed After Suit Posted for Judgment. Application Under Order IX Rule 7 CPC Not Maintainable After Case Reserved for Judgment; Proper Remedy Lies Under Order IX Rule 9 or Order IX Rule 13 CPC.

The petitioner, Abdul Shukoor, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 13.11.2018 pas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Compounding Fee Demand Under Section 96(4) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 for Want of Prior Conversion of Patta Land. Quarrying Activity Commenced When Law Did Not Require Conversion as per Shakeel Pasha v. N. Sivasailam, Hence No Violation of Section 95.

The petitioner, a mineral company holding three quarrying licences granted in 2000 and 2002 for extraction of pink granite on patta agricultural lands...