Search Results for "Punjab Industrial Tribunal"

587 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 587 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Cross-Petitions Against Labour Court Awards Awarding Compensation to Workmen Dismissed After Strike; Maintainability of Reference Under Industrial Disputes Act and Proportionality of Punishment Examined.

The matter involved cross writ petitions arising from Labour Court awards concerning the dismissal of workmen employed by Haldyn Glass Limited. In the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Against Industrial Court Order Dismissing Revision as Time-Barred. Limitation for Revision Under Section 44 of MRTU & PULP Act is Governed by Article 137 of Limitation Act, Not Article 113.

The petitioners, employees of the Irrigation Project, Ratnagiri, were appointed as River Gauge Readers and Rain Gauge Readers and worked from 1979 to ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Reviews Industrial Tribunal's Decision to Reject Approval Application Under Section 33(2)(b) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Tribunal Found Charges Against Employee Not Proved, Resulting in Reinstatement with 50% Back Wages.

The dispute arose between Tata Memorial Hospital, a trust-run institution, and Shashikant Shrikrishna Sompurkar, who was employed as an Upper Division...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employee's Petition, Sets Aside Industrial Court's Order in Domestic Enquiry Case. Labour Court's Vitiation of Enquiry Upheld as Enquiry Officer's Findings Were Perverse for Lack of Evidence on Specific Charge.

The petitioner, Ravindra Bhimrao Patil, an employee of Jawahar Sahakari Sootgirni Ltd., was subjected to a domestic enquiry for allegedly instigating ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Dismissal of Revision Applications as Time-Barred Under MRTU & PULP Act. Limitation for Revision under Section 44 is Governed by Article 137 of Limitation Act, Not Article 113.

The petitioners, employees of the Irrigation Project, Ratnagiri, were appointed as River Gauge Readers and Rain Gauge Readers between 1979 and 1991. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Disputes Reference Order; Considers Whether Long Delay and Non-Recognised Union Vitiate Reference Under Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Petitioner Argues Staleness of Dispute and Lack of Application of Mind by Deputy Commissioner.

The petitioner, Bajaj Auto Limited, a manufacturer of two-wheelers and three-wheelers at Waluj, Aurangabad, challenged an order of reference dated 21 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Interest on Delayed Payment of Labour Court Award Under Section 33-C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Labour Court has power to award interest for period between date of award and actual payment to prevent miscarriage of justice.

The petitioner, Mrs. Prabhavati Ramgarib B., filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal and Labour Cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Interim Reinstatement Order in Service Dispute — Interim Relief Cannot Grant Final Relief at Interim Stage. Labour Court's order directing reinstatement pending final adjudication set aside as impermissible under Section 30(2) of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Zilla Parishad, Jalgaon, challenged an order dated 2.1.2014 passed by the Labour Court at Jalgaon in Complaint (ULP) No. 21 of 2013. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Interest on Delayed Payment of Labour Court Award Under Section 33-C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — Interest Act, 1978 and Article 226 of Constitution Invoked to Prevent Miscarriage of Justice.

The petitioner, Mrs. Prabhavati Ramgarib B., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order of the Central...